Given China’s unmatched record of a 9.9% annual GDP growth right since the time it began experimenting with socialism with Chinese characteristics in 1978, betting against China has always been a bad idea. Indeed, there is enough commentary from even Chinese leaders on how, while China’s export-cum-investment strategy has reached its natural limit, all that China needs to do is to recalibrate, to shift emphasis from investment to consumption and it can easily sustain a 7-8% growth rate. While the previous growth was enough to lift 600 million people out of poverty, a 7% growth means China will contribute a lot more to global growth over the next few years than the US and Europe combined. What should give pause to such optimism, however, is what outgoing President Hu Jintao said in terms of how corruption could cause the Communist Party’s collapse, and the points made in the Party’s resolution on Wednesday.
Interesting analysis by BNP Paribas Equities Research team (excerpted on the oped page today) identifies some of these faultlines that can trip up the Xi presidency. First the maths: between 1979 and 2008, roughly 4.8 percentage points (ppt) of China’s 9.9% growth could be attributed to its higher capital formation, around 1.2% to the increase in the labour force, and a massive 3.9 ppt to the increase in productivity. According to the BNP analysis, with the labour force ageing and its productivity no longer rising as fast, labour will contribute just 0.3 ppt in the next decade, capital formation another 3.2 ppt and productivity around 3.5 ppt, taking China’s growth to around 7% per annum—productivity, however, is notoriously fickle and depends on a host of reforms over the next decade.
A host of reform areas can be mentioned, once you recognise the export-cum-investment led model has largely been exhausted for a variety of reasons—from increasing trade protectionism to the rising renminbi (30% against the dollar in real terms since 2005)—but nothing quite tells the story like what’s happening in China’s labour market where real growth in wages has been outpacing GDP growth over the last decade. In 2005, hourly compensation