When the Cabinet deliberates over the telecom ministry proposal to give a R12,000 crore bailout to telecom PSUs BSNL and MTNL, it would do well to keep in mind the proposal is anti-competitive and makes no commercial sense, especially for a government that is so cash-strapped it is asking cash-rich PSUs like LIC and NMDC to, if need be, bail it out by participating in sales of other PSU shares. Apart from the R12,000 crore waiver of the one-time fees telcos are being asked to pay for the ‘extra’ spectrum they hold, other concessions include refunding the entry fees paid by the PSUs for the BWA spectrum they hold and haven’t been able to do much with despite getting this over a year before the private firms did—indeed, the two PSUs haven’t made much progress with the 3G spectrum they hold despite the nearly 2-year lead they had.
First, the level playing field issue. Since several private telcos are competing, and beating, the two PSUs, waiving their one-time fees while levying it on the private firms means that the PSUs have no incentive to try and turnaround their operations—indeed, they can continue to offer below-cost tariffs which spoil the market for the private firms also. Given that India has a Competition Commission, the fair thing would be to refer the matter to it. While the telecom ministry is justifying the move on the ground that the PSUs serve a social function, it needs to be pointed out that BSNL is now the 4th largest mobile operator in rural areas after Airtel, Vodafone and Idea and its share in the rural market is roughly half of Airtel’s. BSNL also gets subsidies for its fixed line services from the USO Fund. As far as refunding money given by the two PSUs for their broadband spectrum, keep in mind the auction rules specifically ruled this out. Also, if a refund is to be made, and the government doesn’t get the same money in a re-auction, who is going to make this whole?
And, were such refunds to be given, would this make either PSU viable?