- Kingfisher Airlines shares fall after posting quarterly lossSensex falls 91 pts to 1-mth low as ITC, Reliance Industries, ICICI Bank shares hitVijay Mallya's United Breweries auditors fear Kingfisher Airlines exposureKingfisher Airlines loss at $142 mn in Q3 as planes sit idle, waiting for Vijay Mallya's next move
It’s just as well that lenders to Kingfisher Airlines (KFA) have decided to start recovering some of their dues from the bankrupt airline; given that the consortium holds shares of United Spirits Ltd, it should get some Rs 6,500 crore against dues of R7,000 crore. Indeed, it would seem the consortium gave the KFA management way too much time to come up with an equity contribution. The trick in banking is to be able to assess the credibility of a promoter, as much as it is important to gauge his creditworthiness. In the case of Vijay Mallya, it never seemed like the liquor tycoon would be able to raise equity in KFA and the banks could have pulled the plug—ICICI Bank did get out by selling its exposure—much earlier. But bankers in India tend to be liberal with their customers—as seen from the large amounts of loan restructuring—not always cutting off credit lines in time. Moreover, they’re unable to get promoters to toe their line; for instance, despite sitting on large sums of restructured assets of real estate developers, after the global financial meltdown, bankers were unable to get even one property player to sell any significant amount of inventory. One reason for this, of course, is that banks have been allowed to get away with not classifying restructured loans as non-performing assets (NPAs) and also with very liberal provisioning requirements. It was only a few months ago that RBI upped the provisioning for restructured assets to 2.75% and it now proposes to increase this to 5% by FY15; more important, after 2015, any restructured loan will be automatically downgraded to a sub-standard one. But the damage has been done. In short, banks appear to be taking the easy way out wherever they can; after all, nothing prevented them from setting aside larger amounts as provisions for restructured loans or from classifying them as NPAs.
Given this, it might help if RBI was to also tighten the exposure norms that allow a bank to lend up to 15% of its capital funds to a company and up to 40% to a