FE Editorial : Beware the innuendo
One of the underlying points in most anti-graft movements is that we need to go back to the old days, where PSUs held sway, if we want to reduce corruption. So, for instance, if ONGC were to be drilling for gas in the KGD6 basin instead of Reliance, we wouldn’t have had the kind of gold-plating of costs charges that are being levelled today. If Coal India were to be mining the coal, we wouldn’t have had the Coalgate scam; if the Airports Authority of India were to be running the Delhi airport, we wouldn’t have had the kind of allegations we’ve seen against DIAL … Each of the allegations needs to be investigated in a thorough manner, but it’s important in all of this to put aside the myth that PSUs have delivered, and consistently. Private telcos have beaten BSNL in terms of rural penetration, and without the kind of generous grants BSNL gets; Reliance and Cairn have beaten ONGC in terms of their new oil/gas finds; and Air India ceased to carry the bulk of India’s flying public several years ago …
Data put out by the ministry of statistics and programme implementation, carried in FE last week, is even more damning. On the face of it, PSUs are doing a great job in terms of implementing projects at budget. For a sample of 198 projects, which entailed an initial investment of at least R1,000 crore, the cost overrun has averaged a mere 16%.
Be the first to comment.