Retail FDI row: Trial of strength in Parliament set for next week

Comments print
Agencies: New Delhi, Nov 29 2012, 16:43 IST
Ramgopal Yadav.jpg
communal forces at bay, the Congress-led coalition is confident of its numbers.

"I have received 30 notices for discussion on FDI in multi-brand retail under Rule 184. I have admitted the motion to allow the discussion," the Speaker Meira Kumar said.

But in Rajya Sabha, in a discomforting news to the government, Samajwadi Party today said it will vote against FDI in the Upper House where UPA does not have majority on its own.

"We will vote against FDI in Rajya Sabha if the government brings it there," SP leader in the Upper House Ramgopal Yadav said.

SP has nine members in the 244-member House.

After a meeting of leaders of all parties chaired by Rajya Sabha Chairman Hamid Ansari, Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Shukla said that the government has agreed to a discussion on FDI under rule 168 that entails voting.

He said that the date and timing of the discussion will be decided later after consultations with leaders of all parties.

UPA and its allies have a strength of 94 members in the Upper House.

The ten nominated members may go ahead to vote with the government. BSP has 15 MPs and SP nine.

Among the seven independents, three-four may support the government.

BSP, which extends outside support to UPA, has 15 members and it has said that it will disclose its stand on the issue on the floor of the House.

While in Lok Sabha, the government appears to be comfortably placed in the numbers game with promise of support from SP and BSP and

... contd.

Ads by Google
   Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  PVR to acquire up to 95.27 pc stake in Cinemax for Rs 543 cr Next Story  Sensex at 19k, up 329 pts as Goldman Sachs upgrades India
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Funny politics

Raj | 29-Nov-2012Reply | Forward
I do not understand why SP, BSP and DMK are stating that they will support government during voting while they were strongly opposing FDI. The voting is purely on FDI and not a no confidence motion. If these parties work for people and stick to their policies & ethics , they should vote against FDI. If not it could be purely because of money and CBI.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below