Narendra Modi's Washington test

Narendra Modi's Washington test

If Modi gets the world’s biggest power right, his pursuit of larger global goals...
Small banks or banks for ‘small’ people?

Small banks or banks for ‘small’ people?

Unless appropriate sub-limits are imposed on loans, there is a serious...

Editorial: And now, H1-itis

May 07 2014, 21:10 IST
Comments 0
SummaryNHAI suffers the pain of irrational exuberance

Anyone dealing with PSUs in India is familiar with the havoc wrought by L1-itis, or the vigilance-driven rule that mandates PSUs issue tenders for most purchases and then award it to the lowest bidder. As with any law, well-intentioned as it may sound on paper, it gets distorted—and ossified—in its implementation. So, the Central Vigilance Commission now states there must be no post-tender negotiations with even the L1-bidder. And the most extreme form of this was the recent opinion of the Solicitor General in the Taj Mansingh case where, in the matter of renewing the contract, it was argued that putting the hotel up for a bid—and giving the Taj the option to match the best bid—would be tantamount to a post-tender negotiation and therefore violative of CVC guidelines.

A lesser known version of L1-itis, of course, is H1-itis, where the rule is that the highest bidder must be awarded the contract. This newspaper is a supporter of auctions, but irrational exuberance causes its own set of problems as National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has discovered over the past year, and telecom firms over the past several years—fortunately, good auction design can largely take care of this problem. In the case of telecom, the problem was one of constrained auctions—with no spectrum in sight, firms bid the moon for whatever little spectrum was put on offer; put more spectrum on auction, and the bids will automatically get more reasonable. In the case of NHAI, firms bid all manner of amounts for road projects and then, over a period of time, used one pretext or another—it helped that NHAI was not able to procure the necessary land and/or environmental clearances—to walk out of the project. In a downturn, it is obvious any developer will find it difficult to implement projects. But given the huge difference between bidders—GMR bid R636 crore as the first-year premium versus L&T’s R303 crore for the Kishangarh-Ahmedabad expressway, FE reported Tuesday—surely the lower bidder would have found it less onerous.

Under the circumstances, the Deepak Parekh committee’s proposal that NHAI find some way of short-listing serious bidders is one that needs to be implemented. One method, recommended in the past as well, is to short-list bidders on the basis of their experience in building infrastructure, even to keep in mind their net worth. The suggestion was, however, rejected in the past on grounds it discriminated against smaller firms.

Single Page Format
TAGS:
Ads by Google

More from Edit & Columns

Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...