Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on Friday opted out of a third term in office, projecting Congress vice-president Rahul Gandhi as the ideal candidate for the prime minister’s post, at the same time acknowledging public concern over high-profile corruption cases and the limited success of his government in checking inflation and creating manufacturing jobs.
In what was possibly his last media address before the nation goes to polls in a few months, Singh promised to punish the guilty in the telecom and coal scams. He also hoped to get over the temporary hiccups that had cropped up in India’s “high-priority” relations with the US in the wake of the arrest of an Indian diplomat in New York over alleged visa fraud.
Although he listed out achievements like reducing poverty and raising rural wages, which are now indexed to inflation, his address was also marked by a candid admission of where performance did not measure up to the extent he wanted.
Singh also launched a direct and scathing attack on BJP’s prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi, saying it would be “disastrous” to have him as the PM, a comment that invited sharp protests from the Opposition party.
“Rahul Gandhi has outstanding credentials to be nominated as the PM candidate. I hope the Congress party will take that decision at the appropriate time,” Singh, 81, said. Rahul will have to lead the party to polls with a credible plan to address economic growth at a decade low and persisting high inflation, fuelled by rising food prices. India’s economy grew at 4.8% in the July-September period, its fourth successive quarter of below-5% expansion. Wholesale price-based inflation stood at 7.52% in November, a 14-month peak.
Singh said the food security law passed by his government will to some extent shield the common man from rising food prices. He attributed the rising cost of living to higher global prices of commodities and a weaker rupee, saying the government had held steady the prices of items sold through the public distribution system since 2003.
Singh took credit for the increase in per capita consumption in both rural and urban areas, but