Distinction between non-Plan, Plan expenditure likely to go


Posted: Monday, Sep 12, 2005 at 0000 hrs IST
Updated: Monday, Sep 12, 2005 at 0000 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

New Delhi, Sept 11: Taking forward the debate on the merits and demerits of removing the distinction between Plan and non-Plan expenditure, the Planning Commission, in a recent paper, has listed the possible solutions to the problem.

While one of the solutions could be the removal of the Plan, non-Plan distinction, an easier option would be to continue the existing classification with procedural modifications, the paper said.

Even though the Plan, non-Plan accounting distinction has created perverse incentives, distorted outlays and expenditure and generated anomalies at the field level, the underlying logic of identifying and focussing on channeling resources into core infrastructural and social sectors remain, the paper reasoned.

Application of this principle for firming up Plan sizes of states has helped maintain pressure on them to raise resources, it said. The question is whether planning for development can be effected and monitoring done after Plan, non- Plan accounting is abandoned.

Removal of the distinction will imply defining the Plan in terms of budgetary heads of account grouped together in terms of developmental functions for planning and monitoring purposes so that maintenance, upgradation and repair of assets and full staff support can be provided with no pressure to create fresh schemes, the paper said.

It added that the process could be started by including only schemes in which the Plan component is merely extended coverage of an existing programme, that is schemes in which there is no design difference between the Plan and non-Plan account.

Alternatively, the Plan, non-Plan distinction could continue but changes could be introduced to make it less distorting.

Here, too, the paper said, schemes in which there is only extended coverage without design change under the Plan account should be fully brought under the Plan.

This will inflate the Plan size in the year in which the procedure is introduced.

To reduce distortions, the paper suggestion that the Planning Commission should examine availability of adequate non-Plan support for schemes that span both sides.

More from Economy

Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you