of Khobragade. The Indian diplomat was allegedly strip search after her arrest on visa fraud charges.
His call had appeared to calm down the sudden eruption of tensed situation between the two countries.
"We are conveying repeatedly the same message, both about our regret about what happened, but also how we move forward from here."
"That's a consistent message we are conveying diplomatically through proper diplomatic channels to the Indian Government," she said.
Acknowledging that Sangeeta Richard's father-in-law works for the US Embassy in New Delhi, she said: "I can confirm that he either was or is – I don't know the current status – employed in a personal capacity by a US diplomat, not as a US
Harf called "highly inaccurate" India's allegations that the United States did not respond to the series of letters and communications that were made by it.
"It's highly inaccurate to say that we ignored any Government of India communiques on this issue, period," she said, but refused to divulge the details citing legal nature
of the case.
"We're still compiling a precise sequence of all of our government-to-government communications on it – goes back months. Some of these communications are private diplomatic conversations or law enforcement sensitive," she said.
The Indian and US interpretation of the issues and allegations at play throughout this entire scenario, she said.
"But I would say that we have engaged in extensive conversations with the Government of India about this issue in Washington, in New York, in New Delhi, going back to the summer."
"We've also requested the Government of India to provide us with the results of its own enquiry into the allegations made by Dr Khobragade's domestic worker and to make her available to discuss them, I don't think either of which was done," she alleged.