Delhi gangrape: Need effective law to protect women, says Chidambaram

Comments print
Express news service :New Delhi, Feb 04 2013, 15:02 IST
P Chidambaram.jpg
The government has not rejected any of the recommendations forwarded by the Justice JS Verma panel in the ordinance on sexual violence against women, Finance Minister P Chidambaram said today.

The Finance Minister said the ordinance on sexual violence against women was promulgated to meet the 'universal demand' for a law which would be based on the broadest consensus available at the moment.

Finance Minister P Chidambaram said the ordinance will act as a deterrent to criminals and maintained that though all recommendations of the Verma Committee have not been incorporated in it, no suggestion of the panel has been rejected.

He said a Bill on the issue would come up for discussion in Parliament and a legislation passed after reaching the "broadest possible consensus".

"The government hopes stringent provisions in the ordinance will have a deterrent effect on potential criminals till a new law is enacted by Parliament," Chidambaram told reporters here.

President Pranab Mukherjee gave his assent to the ordinance yesterday.

"The Bill will reflect the broadest possible consensus on imperatives and urgent need to have an effective law to protect women and to punish the guilty," Chidambaram said.

The Finance Minister, who heads the Group of Ministers on Media, rejected the view that the government had acted in a hurry on the ordinance and said the measure would derer criminals and that there was a need for promulgating it.

"We are dealing with a grave issue. I appeal to everyone to deal with it with utmost seriousness and sensitivity. I appeal to everyone to respect

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  HTC sees Q1 revenue flat to 17% lower vs Q4 Next Story  Bank of Baroda falls on earnings disappointment
Reader's Comments (6)| Post a Comment

will it really deter ?

KS Raghunathan | 04-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
Mr Chidambaram say, the ordinance would deter criminals. Most rapists such as those in the Delhi Gang-rape case are uneducated and would not have any clue about the ordinance. Its enactment would hopefully deter "potential rapists" amongst the educated.

Mr

Rasik | 04-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
While certainly the Judges would apply their mind and hand a suitable judgement in this most Heinous of Crimes it is hoped a particular sentence by a Police Officer is taken into account who states something close to this - One of the Rapists got very angry and lost control when the Victim bit him - For this a extra 10 years in the overall sentencing should be handed out as this "Getting angry" is made out to be a divine right or what a Freedom fighter feels when his country is attacked - This observation obliquely or tangentially is referred by many as a support to the Perpetrator of the Crime as MAY BE THE VICTIM should have submitted-

Stricter laws? - more important to have true justice

Sam | 04-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
we keep talking of stricter punishment by having more draconian laws. The problem with having stricter laws is that there should be adequate controls that the laws are applied correctly. No One seems to be bothered about that. Mob justice or justice by popular will is not what India should be headed to. We dont want officially sanctioned lynchings just because a group of people want it ! Let me make it very clear. I'm all for punishing the guilty, my point here is that laws have to be implemented fairly. Even the existing laws are misused all the time. The system is easily corrupted by money and other considerations. A law allowing for draconian punishment can, in the wrong hands lead to travesties of justice.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below