|
: Just last week ESPN-Star sports acquired the rights for Cricket’s Champions League for a whopping 900 million dollars. It was the logical culmination of a process that began in the 1980s. Cricket’s rise as the pre-eminent Indian game has been intimately connected with television. Television was consciously turned into a mass medium in the 1980s as a political/developmental strategy. This was accompanied with advertising, which augmented the creation of a ‘new consumer class’ and a new notion of collectivity expressed as ‘the middle class’. The fact that these developments coincided with the 1983 World Cup win fundamentally changed the balance of power between cricket and other sports in India.
Television created conditions for cricket to become a central component of new notions of national identity and consumer spectacle. The advent of satellite television pushed this linkage further and the advent of ESPN in 1993 contributed much to making cricket into India’s secular national pastime. When television capitalists searched for ‘national’ public in their quest to create a ‘national’ market, they ended up with cricket as the lowest denominator of Indian-ness. Satellite television is a cultural arena where the idea of India is debated and fought for every day and its focus on cricket since the 1990s has reinforced the centrality of cricket as a pan-Indian marker of ‘Indian-ness’. This is a two-way process and world cricket itself has been transformed by the massive infusion of capital from Indian television. The enormous money that television has generated for cricket has also transformed India into the spiritual and financial heart of the global cricket industry a process that needs to be applauded by every Indian sports fan.
Certainly this is a link that that sociologists and historians have stressed, ever since C L R James inaugurated the discipline of sport history with the statement: ‘What do they know of cricket who only cricket know?’ Presaging the rise of modern sport history and sociology, his classic Beyond a Boundary stressed how cricket either helped form or supplemented social practices based on the intersecting lines of colour and class in colonial and post-colonial societies. It initiated the study of sport as a relational idiom, as a magnifying glass amplifying the values, symbols, fissures and tensions of a society. Indian cricket literature, in the past decade, has taken this line of enquiry and a great deal of scholarship has stressed its political dimension. There is no...
| Single Page Format | 1 - 2 - Next |
Discuss this story on expressindia forums
|
|
 |
 |
 |
About Us | Contact Us | Advertisers | Site Map | Make us your homepage | Work for Us | RSS | Subscribe | Electronic Edition | Privacy Policy© 2010: The Indian Express Limited. All rights reserved throughout the world
