Congress MPs from Telangana boycott party meeting on FDI

Comments print
Agencies: New Delhi, Dec 04 2012, 12:06 IST
Telanga.jpg
Keeping Congress on tenterhooks on their strategy during the crucial FDI vote tomorrow, eight party MPs from Telangana region in Andhra Pradesh today boycotted a meeting called by party floor leaders in Parliament to seek their assurances on participation in the debate.

The MPs, who have been openly protesting against the Congress and the UPA Government on the non-decision over contentious Telangana statehood demand, also kept the question of skipping the vote tomorrow open saying a decision on this would be taken only tomorrow.

The meeting was called by Home Minister and Leader of Lok Sabha Sushilkumar Shinde and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath to seek their assurances on their vote in favour of the government.

However, only two Union Ministers - S Jaipal Reddy, Sarvey Satyanarayana and Balram Naik - attended the meeting this morning.

"We boycotted the meeting. We did not want to go," Karimnagar MP Ponnam Prabhakar said.

His colleague and Nizamabad MP Madhu Goud Yaskhi also spoke in a similar vein when he said they decided unanimously to boycott the meeting called by party leaders.

The meeting was called today after Prabhakar had indicated yesterday that they could abstain themselves from the vote in protest against the Centre's delay in announcing the formation of a state.

On whether they would participate in the debate today and vote tomorrow, the two MPs were evasive, saying, "it will be decided tomorrow."

The Congress has also issued a three-line whip asking its MPs to be present in Parliament and vote in favour of the Government.

If

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | Next
Previous Story  Wary of cyber security laws, UK eyes softly-softly approach Next Story  Australian motorcycle gang challenges criminal law in court
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Telengana congress MPs

J S Raman | 04-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
Extremely bad article/report. It says only 2 Union ministers attended the meeting but lists 3 names. This is just an example. Of course the grammar as with all present day reporters has gone for a clean toss.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below