Column : Is a foreign governor better for RBI?

Comments print
Madan Sabnavis:  Dec 04 2012, 03:01 IST
The appointment of Mark Carney as the Governor of the Bank of England is interesting for several reasons. This is the first time in the history of the bank that an outsider has been chosen on account of his profile being the best. But, getting in an external candidate for the job does raise certain issues, which would be more relevant when it comes to a country like India. Given that we have an external economic advisor, does a foreign central bank governor make sense?

To begin with, the advantages of having a non-resident governor could be looked at. First, a governor of a central bank who has run the affairs of the bank successfully certainly qualifies for candidature. If the performance has been exemplary, one quite clearly qualifies for a set of countries that have similar structures, such as Canada and England—both developed countries. But the same may not hold true if a central banker from a developed country were to be considered for a country like ours where conditions are vastly different and priorities less aligned to those pursued in the West.

Second, the outsider can bring in a fresh way of thinking to central banking, especially when this sector is in a state of flux. Experiences from other central banks’ handling of crises-like situations are always helpful when drawing up strategies for the domestic central bank. The crises witnessed in the US and the euro regions provide sufficient case studies that have been seen through by central banks via

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  FE Editorial : Voluntary compulsory Next Story  Column : China’s dream team
Reader's Comments| Post a Comment

Be the first to comment.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below