Indian Express

Express India

Screen

Loksatta

Express Cricket

Kashmir Live

Biz Publications
 
Make this your homepage | RSS

TODAY'S COLUMNIST

Column : In the right zone

Ajay Shah

Posted: 2009-01-13 23:41:26+05:30 IST
Updated: Jan 13, 2009 at 2341 hrs IST

: Good corporate governance involves ensuring that each share gets the same benefits. There are three zones of interest. In Zone-I, the promoter owns a lot. When the promoter owns 90%, he gets 90% of the true profit of the company anyway. He can only grab 10% more by stealing from the outside shareholders. For this reason, even in countries with weak institutions, corporate governance works out okay for such companies. This is an easy incremental step for family businesses or PSUs: a little outside capital is brought in but basically nothing changes.

The difficulties are worst in Zone-II, where a promoter who owns 51% can make a grab for (say) 80% of the cash produced by the business. Such theft presents acute problems because with 51% of shares, the promoter cannot be displaced. For this reason, outside shareholders are least willing to pay a good price for such companies.

In good countries, companies with a low promoter ownership—such as 5% to 15%—work the best. In this Zone-III, the low ownership of the CEO makes him vulnerable to being sacked, so the incidence of theft is low. This helps to attract large quantities of public equity capital; these companies grow big. At the same time, such companies avoid the inefficiencies which go with family run companies particularly over long horizons. In good countries, Zone-III companies have the best chance of becoming meritocracies. The DNA of a young employee does not disqualify him for the CEO’s job, which improves his drive.

By and large, India is doing okay in Zone-I and Zone-II. In Zone-I, not much needs to be done. In Zone-II, paying low valuations is really the only defence. Even in good countries, it is difficult to prevent theft by a promoter that can’t be sacked. The real story of corporate governance lies in Zone-III. In March 2001, the family had 25.5% of Satyam. This had dropped below 20% in September 2003 and below 10% in June 2006. The Satyam episode hence puts a spotlight on India’s difficulties with the critical Zone-III.

From the viewpoint of economic development, this is the most important zone. The best growth path for a family business is to graduate to Zone-III and harness the energies of professional management. Family businesses that fail to do this by the 3rd generation tend to get enfeebled. The country needs to create the institutional environment that fosters efficiency in Zone-III for that is...

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - 3 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Corporate Governance
Posted by Vivek Bhargava on 2009-01-26 14:23:03.693039+05:30
Corporate Governance is governed more by management INTENT than regulation. A lower percentage of ownership guarantees nothing unless one understands the quality of institutional holding. High shareholding of domestic institutions has rarely ensured better corporate governance. Holdings by FIIs and MFs cannot guarantee better corporate governance because they are not permanent investors in the companies that they invest in. The subtle messages that one gets from the corporate governance and other corporate / financial behaviour of a company, relative to its peers is what one has to use to understand management intent. Regulation only defines the ZONE within which promoter managements can play around to take advantage of the situation. The major problem is with the implementation. Even now most a lot of people believe that nothing much will happen to the promoters of Satyman. That is the faith / confidence people have in the implementation of our laws!! There can be no corporate governance when there is no fear. For investors, management INTENT is the only guiding principle. Not difficult to figure out if you really want to SEE!!

Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Send Gifts
Flowers and Gifts
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you

Column : In the right zone