Column : From Foxconn to Nokia, and more

Comments print
Sunil Jain : Feb 08 2013, 20:59 IST
work done by a Foxconn or a Nokia India on an item that is exported? Should this just be done by, for instance, looking at rates charged by different local industries—in this case, assembly units for electronics—and using them as a benchmark for calculating an acceptable arms-length price?

Every case differs from the other, and transfer pricing is a hotly debated subject all over the world, but any tax demand has to be seen in the context of the impact this will have on India’s desire to grow as a manufacturing base. Given that, going by the budget documents, India gave R2,12,167 crore of excise duty concessions to the manufacturing sector in FY12, and another R51,292 crore of concessions to corporates in general, it’s a fair assumption that India does want to grow its manufacturing. Which is why, as FE has argued in the past, the fact that there has been an 85% increase in the number of transfer pricing demands by the taxman in FY12—from R1,220 crore in FY06 to R24,111 crore in FY11 and to R44,532 crore in FY12—is deeply disturbing.

In the case of Nokia, apart from the transfer pricing, there are elements of the Vodafone retrospective case as well. Nokia has been issued a tax demand of R3,000 crore for not paying taxes on the software it was importing from its Finnish parent over the years. The problem here is the explanatory memorandum of the budget (page 20 for those who’re interested) itself says “Some judicial decisions have

... contd.

Ads by Google
   Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  FE Editorial : Power’s UPs and downs Next Story  Hotel Leelaventure founder Capt C P Krishnan Nair steps down as Chairman, son Vivek steps in
Reader's Comments (3)| Post a Comment

Fe Comment

Paresh V | 08-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
Very apt article. Highly subjective and retrograde interpretations of guidelines has been the norm in Transfer pricing decisions by the TP officers all over India. Even when the software exports were tax free, they readjusted profits to ridiculous amounts, using non-transparent data available only to the department. They used the term that readjusted profit does not enjoy tax exemption in devious manner. All this is done in name of widening tax base and getting more revenue. It completely ignores the ill effect and uncertainty on business climate in the country.

Fe Comment

Paresh V | 08-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
Very apt article. Highly subjective and retrograde interpretations of guidelines has been the norm in Transfer pricing decisions by the TP officers all over India. Even when the software exports were tax free, they readjusted profits to ridiculous amounts, using non-transparent data available only to the department. They used the term that readjusted profit does not enjoy tax exemption in devious manner. All this is done in name of widening tax base and getting more revenue. It completely ignores the ill effect and uncertainty on business climate in the country.

Fe Comment

Paresh V | 08-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
Very apt article. Highly subjective and retrograde interpretations of guidelines has been the norm in Transfer pricing decisions by the TP officers all over India. Even when the software exports were tax free, they readjusted profits to ridiculous amounts, using non-transparent data available only to the department. They used the term that readjusted profit does not enjoy tax exemption in devious manner. All this is done in name of widening tax base and getting more revenue. It completely ignores the ill effect and uncertainty on business climate in the country.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below