Column: Does majority equal minority?
Anil Agarwal tried in 2008 and failed. Last year, in its second attempt, the Agarwal-led Vedanta Resources succeeded in restructuring the group via a scheme of arrangements that merged group companies Sesa Goa and Sterlite.
At the Sesa Goa shareholder meeting, 91.7% of voters present, representing 79.12% of votes in value favoured the merger resolution—promoter shareholding in Sesa Goa stood at 55.1%.At the Sterlite shareholder meeting, 89.75% of voters present, representing 92% of votes in value favoured the merger resolution—promoter shareholding stood at 53.3%. In both meetings, the votes cast in favour of the scheme exceeded the minimum requirement (special resolution: greater than 75% by value, greater than 50% by number of those present), despite analysts’ misgivings about the merger, and proxy advisory firms’ recommendations that shareholders vote against it.
More recently, analysts and investors protested a hike in royalty payments by Indian cement companies ACC and Ambuja to parent Holcim. But the resolutions needed a simple majority to pass and promoter Holcim’s more than 50% stake in each company saved the day. In both companies, an overwhelming majority of public shareholders’ votes were cast against the royalty hike but...
There are dozens of such instances where minority investors in Indian companies have ‘almost won’ their battles against the majority (read promoter or ‘controlling’) shareholders. Now victory seems more certain.
Here’s why. The Companies Bill 2012 has taken a giant step—it mandates that all related party transactions (RPTs)
Be the first to comment.