Churn in Pak, local pressure behind India’s tough stand

Comments print
PranabDhalSamanta: New Delhi, Jan 17 2013, 01:24 IST
FP.jpg
The government’s decision to adopt a hard line against Pakistan over the killing of two Indian soldiers on the Line of Control was taken on Monday at a hurriedly called meeting of the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS), which resulted in the suspension of the implementation of the new visa agreement and cooling of sporting ties.

A day later, it also saw Prime Minister Manmohan Singh making his first comments on the incident, warning Islamabad that it cannot be business as usual and demanding that those responsible for beheading an Indian soldier be brought to book.

The sequence of events took most by surprise because around 5 pm on Monday, the Indian high commission in Pakistan issued a press statement announcing that the visa-on-arrival system for senior Pakistani citizens would start from Tuesday, signalling that the first part of the new visa agreement was being implemented.

But a different script was being written in New Delhi. The CCS was called to take stock of the flag meeting between local commanders of India and Pakistan earlier that day, as well as to assess the overall situation in the wake of growing anger among the troops and the strong political statements from the BJP.

It was also the day Sushma Swaraj had called for bringing back 10 heads from Pakistan in retaliation, echoing sentiments of troops in the 13 Rajputana Rifles regiment to which the two dead soldiers, Hemraj and Sudhakar Singh, belonged. The CCS meeting was to be held earlier but had to

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Monorail rises in East, work starts in 2 months Next Story  Column: India in 2013: stemming the rot
Reader's Comments (5)| Post a Comment

This must be an Election Trick

V.P. Abraham | 17-Jan-2013Reply | Forward
There is election coming in Pakistan as well as in India. This must be a prelude to the Election to get support from different parties in the respective countries. This is my personal opinion

This UPA government stand is difficult to understand.

Ram | 17-Jan-2013Reply | Forward
I find it hard to understand how the government can accept a situation when a soldier's head is not returned. How is it ok to sacrifice a soldier's head? Totally insensitive and absurd of the government to accept the situation.

India remains a punching bag

Pradeep Mawar | 17-Jan-2013Reply | Forward
Pakistanis come, cross the border, kill, mutilate the Indian soldiers and sometimes civilians too, spread terrorism, plant mines. India retaliates only to the extant of giving words of wisdom, DGMOs exchange words. Pakistan denies all charges. Politicians pacify the situation, Chief of Army staff visits soldiers house, calm starts to return and bilateral trade also starts. Who is the loser? India has lost the head of a brave soldier, guarding the border. If India demands the head and it is not given, how can we be complecent. We have got to raid and as per advise of sushma, get 20 heads for the two. Strike them to show them that we pinch them and give the message that complecency has a limit. Escalation of any form of terrorism can be given a befitting reply by Indians.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below