'Chokers' tag continue to haunt Proteas

Agencies

Posted: Friday, Jun 19, 2009 at 1209 hrs IST
Updated: Friday, Jun 19, 2009 at 1209 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss
  • Discount UK Shopping

London: South Africa are "chokers" and they continue to provide evidence that the tag is not given to them without reason although skipper Graeme Smith begs to differ.

For all the right words, sane and sanguine thinking and public posturing, skipper Smith did let it slip when he conceded his side would be "devastated" by Thursday's seven-run defeat at the hands of Pakistan in the first semifinal of the Twenty20 World Cup.

This crushing sense of loss of so many reverses - 1996, 1999, 2003 and 2007 World Cups; the roadblocks of Champions Trophy and now two successive ICC World Twenty20 - must have taken a toll on the Proteas cricketers' psyche.

Other occasions too come to mind in an instant: losing the semifinals of the ICC Knockout Trophy in 2000; two years later losing to India in the semifinals from an astonishing position and then semifinalists again in 2006 edition of the ICC Knock Out Trophy.

Words alone don't provide cure - correctives do but South Africa, since its readmission into the game in early 90s, has only been a bridesmaid or worse.

Choking, according to a research, comes from thinking too much. It causes a loss of instinct and panic sets in. It happens when a sportsman experiences spasms of doubt and is unable to focus. Negative thoughts unleash anxiety and a player loses his ability to perform under pressure. The result is disaster.

The inclusion of former England international and sports psychologist Jeremy Snape in the South African team's support staff two years ago had a specific purpose - it was to deal and then flush out the negative psychosis which grips the Protea players in moments of crisis.

When South Africa could chase down 400-plus target in Perth or when they won the Test series Down Under for the first time early this year, it appeared Snape had done the catharsis for South Africa.

Similar was the case in Pakistan where a 2-2 deadlock was

turned into a 3-2 scoreline. It then chased down 281 against England and 414 against Australia at WACA. The extraordinary WACA run-chase was completed by two youngest batsmen in the team, AB de Villiers and JP Duminy.

It was believed the younger lot don't carry the hangover. Dale Steyn and Morkel brothers - Albie and Morne - only know how to win. Before the defeat at the hands of Australia early this year, most in the team never tasted a series...

More from Sports

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Were they really chokers
Posted by Padam Singh on 2009-06-19 12:47:29.265536+05:30
When any team loses to the Pakistanis, they are said to choke. Not so. The SA team played well for the format of the game where anything can happen. The reason is that the Pakistanis play for their country and hence their brilliance always comes out when they are down. We Indians play for money or for personal reasons.

Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you

'Chokers' tag continue to haunt Proteas
SA continue to provide evidence that the 'Chokers' tag is not given to them without reason although skipper Smith begs to differ.