Narendra Modi's Washington test

Narendra Modi's Washington test

If Modi gets the world’s biggest power right, his pursuit of larger global goals...
Small banks or banks for ‘small’ people?

Small banks or banks for ‘small’ people?

Unless appropriate sub-limits are imposed on loans, there is a serious...

Cheating case: India junks Samsung chief Lee Kun-Hee's plea, arrest warrant issued

Apr 03 2014, 09:41 IST
Comments 0
Supreme Court has refused to quash the criminal proceedings against Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Kun-Hee in a $1.4 million cheating case. Supreme Court has refused to quash the criminal proceedings against Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Kun-Hee in a $1.4 million cheating case.
SummarySupreme Court orders Samsung chief Lee Kun-Hee to surrender in Ghaziabad.

The Supreme Court has asked Lee Kun-Hee, Chairman of Samsung Electronics, to surrender before a trial court in Ghaziabad in Uttar Pradesh in connection with a cheating case.

A bench led by Justice C K Prasad refused to quash the criminal proceedings against Kun-Hee in a $1.4 million cheating case and asked him to present himself before the trial court to seek bail or excuse from appearance in person. The non-bailable arrest warrant issued by the court has however been suspended for six weeks.

Also read: Apple Inc. vows to prove Samsung Electronics copied iPhone features as new patent trial opens

“The warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner shall not be executed for a period of six weeks from today. In the meanwhile, the petitioner shall appear before the trial court in seisin of the case and seek bail and/or exemption from appearance in accordance with law,” said the bench.

The Ghaziabad trial court had first issued a non-bailable warrant against Mr Kun-hee in 2012 after which Samsung's boss had approached the Allahabad High Court for relief.

The High Court declined to quash the case and termed Kun-hee as an absconder and a fugitive. The company then moved the Supreme Court against this order. The SC had in June 2013 stayed the order of his arrest but eventually found no merit in his case to interfere with the trial court proceedings at this stage.

“The Special Leave Petition is dismissed. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion in regard to the merit of the case,” said the court in its order on March 31.

Ads by Google
Reader´s Comments
| Post a Comment
Please Wait while comments are loading...