The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Friday filed a charge sheet alleging irregularities in spectrum allocation during 2002-03 to Bharti Airtel and Vodafone India (then divided into two companies Sterling Cellular and Hutchison Max) beyond 6.2 MHz, pegging the loss to the exchequer at R846 crore. However, no names of any officials or promoters of the respective companies have been mentioned. The then telecom secretary Shyamal Ghosh has also been chargesheeted by CBI for allegedly conspiring with the companies and telecom minister Pramod Mahajan to grant the additional spectrum. Since Mahajan is no more, CBI has not proposed any action against him.
This is the fourth charge sheet filed by the CBI in the 2G spectrum case; however, politically, it is relevant because it is the first which relates to the NDA governmentperiod.
The accused have been chargesheeted under Section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC and various provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act relating to misconduct by public servant by accepting illegal gratification by abusing his official position.
The charge sheet which was filed before the special CBI Judge OP Saini mentions 73 witnesses in the case including the then deputy director general in the department of telecommunications, JR Gupta. When the CBI had registered an FIR in the case in November 2011, it had mentioned Gupta’s name also and raided him.
The court will consider the charge sheet on January 14.
Though Bharti and Vodafone declined comment on Friday, previously, they had denied any wrongdoing.
Broadly, the CBI’s charge is that Bharti and Vodafone were beneficiaries of the department of telecommunication’s move on January 31, 2002 to allocate additional spectrum beyond 6.2 MHz and subsequently from 8 MHz to 10 MHz. It says the then telecom minister, the late Mahajan and Ghosh showed undue haste in clearing the proposal bypassing the Telecom Commisssion, Trai, member (finance) and the wireless advisor. Ghosh, in conspiracy with Mahajan and the accused companies, is alleged to have granted the additional spectrum with a spectrum usage charge of 1% of their adjusted gross revenue instead of 2%.
The CBI says while the technical committee of the DoT had