On March 14, 2011 the Punjab and Haryana High Court had ordered complete stay on construction in the catchment area of Sukhna Lake. ‘Aggrieved’, few builders had moved the Supreme Court against the high court order. This stay (March 14, 2011) was granted three months after the high court had stayed the construction of Tata Camelot housing project which falls in the catchment area. (January 20, 2011)
For nearly two years, the builders pursued their appeal in the Supreme Court. Interestingly, barely a fortnight after the Punjab and Haryana High Court lifted its stay on the construction of the Camelot project, the builders withdrew their appeal ‘unconditionally’.
The development assumes significance as the high court has lifted stay only on the construction of Tata Camelot housing project. A division bench of the high court, however, made it clear that its stay on all other constructions in the Sukhna catchment area, granted on March 14, 2011, will continue till further orders.
Surprisingly, the builders had challenged the March 14 order. Despite no relief from the high court, the builders, for reasons best known to them, decided to withdraw their appeal. Sample this: On August 21 the high court lifted stay only for Tata Camelot project making it clear that all other constructions will not be allowed till the court lifts its stay. On September 2, the builders request the Supreme Court to allow them to withdraw their appeal ‘unconditionally’. The same has been allowed.
Crying foul, and dubbing it a proxy litigation on behalf of Tata, the amicus curiae in the case had contended that the withdrawal is not bonafide. The opposite counsels averred that the builders were batting for Tata. The builders had challenged the overall stay on construction in catchment area. Despite the high court refusing to vacate the stay, the builders, after two years, have withdrawn their appeal.
“Counsel for the petitioners, seeks withdrawal of these special leave petitions unconditionally. Special leave petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of special leave petitions, pending interlocutory applications do not survive and they stand dismissed as such”, reads the Supreme Court order.