- Maintain 'add' raing on Tata Power shares, target price Rs 87: Kotak Institutional EquitiesTata Global Beverages gets bourses' nod to merge Mount EverestGovt panel gives JSPL, Tata Steel, others 9 months to get green nodTata Power's Mundra project tariff hike to be about 47 paise/unit
The list of aspirants for a bank licence may have lost its most marquee name — Tata — along the way, but it’s nonetheless pedigreed: The Birlas and Bajajs are still hanging in as are L&T Finance, the microfinance outfit Janalakshmi Financial Services and infratructure lender IDFC.
On Tuesday, the wait for a licence got shorter after the four-member Jalan committee told the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) which of the 25 applicants it felt were the most eligible. The committee, chaired by former RBI governor Bimal Jalan, also comprised former RBI deputy governor Usha Thorat, former Sebi chairman CB Bhave and financial sector expert Nachiket Mor.
While there has been much talk of how the RBI will give out three or four licences, a central bank discussion paper on banking structures put out in late August last year had noted the need for continuous and differentiated licences. “There is a case for reviewing the current ‘stop and go’ licensing policy and consider adopting a ‘continuous authorisation’ policy,” the paper had observed.
Analysts have pointed out that the new set of banks will not find it easy to wean away market share from the earlier lot of 11 private banks, who set up shop in 1993 and 2003. These banks not only have the best technology, their service standards are also high. However, newer players can hope to take away share from public sector lenders that are strapped for capital and will be for some time. Moreover, these banks aren’t always able to match the service standards of their private peers.
While prospective entrants have been apprehensive they will need to open 25% of the branches in unbanked areas, a condition imposed only incrementally for incumbents, this might not prove to be as challenging even though some branches will lose money in the initial years.
Those NBFCs that have some existing rural lending infrastructure will have an edge over others. Meeting priority sector lending targets too might not turn out to be as onerous as perceived given the scope of priority sector has also been broadened.
Several NBFCs have been deterred by the