Indian Express

Express India

Screen

Loksatta

Express Cricket

Kashmir Live

Biz Publications
 
Make this your homepage | RSS


BY INVITATION : DILJEET TITUS & NAGENDRA KASANA

Bhala uski kameez meri kameez se safed kaise?


Posted: Tuesday, Sep 09, 2008 at 0154 hrs IST
Updated: Tuesday, Sep 09, 2008 at 0154 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

: Comparative advertising, as the name suggests, is advertising of a product or service by comparing it with similar products or services (usually the compe-titor’s). One advantage of comparative advertising is that it improves the quality of information available to consumers, thus enabling them to make more informed decisions relating to a choice between competing products/services by demonstrating the merits of comparable products.

However, there is an implicit danger in the practice. Once an entity addresses the merits and inadequacies of competing goods or services, it may be tempted to denigrate them or derive unfair advantages from such inaccurate comparisons. In such a scenario, commercial relationships get exposed to the constant threat of unfair practices.

The Trademark Act, 1999, allows the use of a registered trademark by a person for the purposes of identifying products or services as those of the proprietor, provided the use is:

* In accordance with honest practices followed in industrial or commercial spheres;

* and does not take unfair advantage of or is detrimental to the distinctive character or reputation of the trademark.

Subject to reasonable restrictions imposed under Article 19(2) of the Constitution, an advertisement is considered to be commercial speech guaranteed under Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution of India.

A case in point is Paras Pharmaceuticals Ltd versus Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd and Two Others, where the dispute related to the television commercial of Volini pain reliever manufactured by Ranbaxy Laboratories. In the said ad/television commercial, a woman (presumably the mother) was shown flipping out a box of pain relievers that bore uncanny resemblance to the packaging of Moov, marketed by Paras Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Later in the commercial, another woman was shown coming to the rescue of the first woman (mom) and suggesting another remedy. She offered a pack of Volini gel to her saying, “You need a true pain reliever.” The Gujarat High Court held that the advertisement disparaged Paras Pharmaceuticals Ltd’s product.

Another case in point is Eureka Forbes Ltd versus Pentair Water India Pvt Ltd. It was over an advertisement that claimed “Water contains contaminants that are invisible to the naked eye and to your UV water purifier.” The Court granted an order of injunction that restrained Pentair Water India from broadcasting that advertisement, or circulating or distributing any material defaming or maligning Eureka Forbes’ Aquaguard or UV Purifiers. The Court observed that since Eureka Forbes used UV technology in Aquaguard, the...

More from BrandWagon

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - 3 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you