After court order, DoT blocks 78 web links critical of IIPM

Comments print
ENS Economic Bureau: New Delhi, Feb 16 2013, 02:09 IST
Arindam Chaudhary.jpg
Following a court order, the Department of Telecommunications has ordered Internet service providers (ISPs) to block 78 web links containing material critical of Arindam Chaudhuri-promoted business school Indian Institute of Planning and Management (IIPM).

The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) issued the order on Thursday.

“We are only following directive by a Gwalior court that has ordered blocking of these websites,” Gulshan Rai, director general of Computer Emergency Response Team-India (CERT-In) told The Indian Express.

Notably, the first uniform resource locator (URL) address in the list is of a notification issued by the University Grants Commission (UGC).

The UGC has issued advisories in the past stating that IIPM is not a university that comes within the ambit of Section 2(f) of the UGC Act 1956 and does not have the right of conferring or granting degrees.

When contacted, UGC said that its legal department was still to get any information in this regard.

Following the DoT move, attempts to open the links in the list result in the display of the message: “The page you have requested has been blocked, because the URL has been blocked as per DoT (India) guidelines.”

Other URLs that have been blocked include website of various media houses. Along with the link of the story on the website of The Indian Express, the other blocked links include those from The Economic Times, The Times of India and Outlook, among others.

Ads by Google
   
Previous Story  Column: Making scarce spectrum deliver more Next Story  FE Editorial : Price in a rate cut
Reader's Comments (2)| Post a Comment

Fe Comment

sanjay | 19-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
I am a student of IIPM and I feel gr8 that the defamatory links are blocked. IIPM is a world class Institute and features in the top 10 rankings, at times even ahead of some of the IIMs. If you can't deal with it, that doesn't mean you can oppose an institute's right to go to courts to get defamatory content removed.

Censorship

Chandrasekharan | 16-Feb-2013Reply | Forward
Is it necessary that we must muzzle all criticism and differences of opinion? I think the average Indian will do his own research to arrive at reasoned conclusions. And going by what all has been happening at the highest levels in this country, we must encourage reasoned criticisms.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below