A year of lassitude

Comments print
C. Raja Mohan : Dec 28 2012, 02:31 IST
Crajamohan,.jpg
As UPA 2 enters the last full year of its tenure, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh needs to devote substantive energies to advance India’s three most important bilateral relationships — with Pakistan, China and America. He must overcome the current political conservatism on foreign policy in the government, and make some big moves towards Islamabad, Beijing and Washington in 2013. Failure to act boldly, however, could see major setbacks on all three fronts.

Eight and a half years ago, the UPA government inherited an ambitious foreign policy agenda from the BJP-led NDA regime. Breaking the defensive tradition of Indian diplomacy, Atal Bihari Vajpayee set out to transform Delhi’s ties with America, China, and Pakistan.

If Vajpayee’s decision to conduct the nuclear tests in May 1998 put India in crisis mode with the three countries, his post-Pokhran diplomacy attempted to restructure relations with all of them. Vajpayee sought to end India’s prolonged international nuclear isolation in collaboration with the US and find a way to address India’s long-standing territorial disputes with Pakistan and China.

Unlike the Congress leadership, Vajpayee had no baggage to carry from the past and was unconstrained by the conventional wisdom on foreign policy. Although he could not bring any of his initiatives to fruition, he successfully altered the political framework for engaging America, China and Pakistan.

In the first term of the UPA government, Manmohan Singh ran with the baton. He invested much of his political capital to negotiate and implement the historic civil nuclear initiative and deepen the partnership with

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Bristol-Myers Squibb files patent infringement case against Dr Reddy's Laboratories Next Story  Narendra Modi, by default
Reader's Comments (2)| Post a Comment

partial analysis

D Saraswati | 30-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
I am an ardent follower of C. Rajamohan's article on foreign policy but the way he has termed the year "lassitude" is beyond my understanding. To my knowledge India had been actively involved in several multilateral and bilateral diplomacy throughout the year. I hope he will cover all these in his forthcoming articles, for which we eagerly wait. It is, however, true that Indian diplomacy was marred by several internal and external reasons. External factors are mostly beyond our control but we need to set our house in order too, which is a prerequisite to pursue nations diplomacy vigoursly.

Incomplete Analysis!

Surendra Barsode | 28-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
Is Raja is coming out with Part II of this article? He has just completed Part I of the Indian foreign policy challenges and stopped just short of proposing what we can do with our "three friends" in next 1 year. As with Pak, I do not see any specific progress on Siachin, Sir Creek or any other issues given that in both countries, elections are due soon. MFN status and visa implmentation will waste 1 more year easily. With China, again the same story, as new order has taken place there and there is hardly anything concrete on table. Border, with or without dispute, is broadly stable and that should continue. US will wait till new government is formed in 2014 and India is not a priority now for them. We need to show our willingness to "partner" with US and our Eastern neigbhours to "contain" China and deepen engagement with US defence/military. Our interest in AF area should not really extend beyond ensuring that we do not suffer troubles from "fundamentalists" there..

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below