A First Estimate Of Petty Corruption

Comments print
Dec 20 2002, 00:00 IST
Tags:
Tucked away in the inside pages of a national daily was a report this week that the Anti-Corruption Bureau had nabbed “red-handed” a lowly official accepting a princely bribe of Rs 100. The official, we were informed, has been immediately suspended. He was caught accepting the money “across the table”, not even under the table, much like the infamous Mr Bangaru Laxman, former President of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

The crime may be small in monetary terms but the punishment was exemplary. All punishment is meant to be exemplary because no system can ever catch all offenders. When a thief is caught, he is subject to exemplary punishment as a warning to potential thieves. The inequity in the system however lies in the fact that while this gent got caught and was suspended for petty corruption, those who transact in crores almost always go scot-free.

The corruption of the big, “grand larceny”, says a report of Transparency International India (TII), “by its very nature is difficult to detect. Both the giver and the taker are beneficiaries of the corruption.” When exposed, as in the case of Bofors, Hawala and the Tehelka scams, such big corruption makes big news but rarely is there any exemplary punishment. When caught, corrupt politicians often use the so-called “verdict of the electorate” as a smokescreen to escape punishment by manipulating the system. To do this they often subvert the law and order machinery and co-opt the law enforcers. Little wonder then that in public perception the “most

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Disciplining Auditors Next Story  US Senator For Joining India In Genome Sequencing
Reader's Comments| Post a Comment

Be the first to comment.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below