Teva lawsuit against USV withdrawn

Reghu Balakrishnan

Posted: Saturday, Sep 08, 2007 at 0000 hrs IST
Updated: Saturday, Sep 08, 2007 at 0315 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss
  • Discount UK Shopping

Mumbai, Sep 7: In a morale booster for the Indian pharmaceuticals industry, reeling under a flood of patent infringement litigations, the world’s largest generic drug manufacturer, Teva, has withdrawn a case filed against Mumbai-based USV Ltd. Teva had accused USV of infringing the patent of Teva’s carvedilol active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), the major ingredient in GlaxoSmithkline’s (GSK’s) cardiac drug, Coreg.

Meanwhile, the US Food & Drug Administration gave its approval for generic versions of Coreg to Aurobindo Pharma, Caraco Pharma, Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Lupin, Ranbaxy Laboratories and Zydus Pharmaceuticals on September 5, the same day of its patent expiry.

Last month, a lawsuit against USV was dismissed “without prejudice” by Judge John Hughes of the US district court for the district of New Jersey at Teva’s request. The judge also ruled that USV has the right to import carvedilol into the US. The verdict makes USV free to re-file a drug master file for carvedilol (base or phosphate). The current US sale of Coreg stands at $1,555.4 million, with global sales of $2,211 million.

On July 3, FE had reported Teva’s filing of suits against Ranbaxy, Dr Reddy’s Labs, Lupin, Orchid, Cadila Pharmaceuticals, USV Ltd and Wanbury Ltd alleging the firms infringed the patent that Teva has been granted for carvedilol API.

K Rajendran, head, knowledge cell, USV, said, “This move by Teva may be interpreted as a market protection move aimed at stopping these future generic players as long as it can and reaping a financial windfall while it lasts.”

Mark Pohl, the US pharmaceutical patent attorney who represented USV, said, “We informed Teva that USV would seek a hefty fine against them, as Teva’s action is an attempted monopolisation which is a federal antitrust violation. In this way, USV was not looking either to file a counter suit or ask for a simple dismissal of the case.” Later, in court, Teva’s lawyers said the suit against USV had no basis, and that it should be dismissed, he added.

More from Frontpage

Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you