UK | Banking

Surviving, not thriving

The Economist
Posted: Thursday, Jul 29, 2010 at 2335 hrs IST
Updated: Thursday, Jul 29, 2010 at 0354 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

: Britain's biggest banks may pass the common “stress test” for resilience that was applied recently to banks in the European Union. But that glosses over a long-term structural problem which makes them more of a burden than a benefit to the national economy. As banks struggle to deal with it, they may be smothering the chances of new entrants offering customers and small businesses a competitive alternative.

The problem is their addiction to government-supported funding: £165 billion of it through a Special Liquidity Scheme, which lets them refinance mortgage securities and other assets at a discount to market rates; and £120 billion more raised through bond issues bearing a government guarantee. These two schemes are due to come to an end in 2012, presenting the country’s big banks with a refinancing mountain. And other wholesale debt is also falling due—perhaps as much as £480 billion over the next three years. At the moment the banks are raising funds of around £12 billion a month, only half the rate they will need when the other bills are presented. Whether the Treasury will relent when the deadline arrives and keep some of its support in place is an open question.

The uncertainty means that big banks are hellbent on shoring up their balance-sheets by charging interest rates on loans that are much higher than the rates they themselves pay to borrow. This is not an outcome that pleases Vince Cable, the business secretary, who has been critical of bank behaviour since the onset of the credit crisis. But Cable is not likely to see banks lend more—or more affordably—to small firms, as some state-assisted ones have promised under supposedly binding agreements, until their balance-sheet restructuring is under control.

All these banks are trying to lower the ratio of loans to customer deposits; sounder banks will be rewarded when a new banking levy comes into force next year. Lloyds Banking Group, for example, has a loans-to-deposit ratio of 169%, according to research by Nomura Securities. Barclays and RBS are at 130% and 134%, respectively. But the banks may be wrong to think that squeezing loans will improve these ratios; the Bank of England warned in June that growth in lending is usually the main driver of higher deposits.

Banks are also competing for savings with the purveyors of other sorts of investments, such as unit trusts and tax-free National Savings & Investments (NSI)...

More from Selections From The Economist

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you