Indian Express

Express India

Screen

Loksatta

Express Cricket

Kashmir Live

Biz Publications
 
| Make this your homepage | Feedback

INTERVIEW : JOHN RUGGIE

‘States have a duty to protect against corporate abuse’


Posted: Sep 16, 2007 at 0000 hrs IST
Updated: Sep 15, 2007 at 2338 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss
Rate This Article
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Rating:  0

international and national levels. Several guiding principles are already apparent though, including that any “grand strategy” needs to build out from the existing capacity of states and the states system to regulate and adjudicate harmful actions by corporations, not undermine it. We need to further clarify and progressively codify the duties of states to protect human rights against corporate violations: individually, as host and home states, as well as through collective action.

The law of the land varies from country to country. Isn’t it unrealistic to expect MNCs to embed universal codes into subsidiaries and supply chains?

This is an important question with which we’re currently grappling. My mandate also asked me to clarify the implications of concepts such as corporate “sphere of influence.” To do so requires thinking about the different challenges facing a wide variety of businesses and industries. We have also been thinking more about responsibility for acts by subsidiaries and those further down the supply chain.

Can market instruments like socially responsible investment funds that promote human rights be more useful?

No single measure would yield more immediate results in the human rights performance of firms than conducting impact assessments where a significant human rights impact can be expected. Several tools are now available and we need to test the available tools in the real world, not strive for theoretical perfection. Governments and companies need to step forward and cooperate with community groups and others in piloting these tools, so that the human rights impacts of business can be better understood and improved.

Is there a business case for human rights?

The most obvious business case is risk management, brand protection, and contributing to sustainable communities — better work forces and a growing customer base.

What next?

We’re at an exciting stage in the mandate, which has been extended until June 2008. Our 2007 report received a favourable response from business and major NGOs have voiced agreement that no single silver bullet can resolve all business and human rights challenges. Governments from across the spectrum of regions and levels of development expressed appreciation for the objective, systematic and inclusive approach we’ve taken. As a result, I believe we have a good basis for the next phase — devising recommendations that promise to generate positive results on the ground. To this end, we’re currently exploring the implications of some of the guiding principles mentioned above. As usual,...

Single Page Format Previous - 1 - 2 - 3 - Next
Ads by Google

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views represented here are not endorsed by www.financialexpress.com. The person writing and submitting the comment is / are responsible for the content of comment. The comment should not have inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication. There will be time lag between the submission and publication of the comments. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Shaadi Matrimonials
Get Marriage Proposals by Email EVERYDAY!
Register FREE on Naukri.com.
200000+ Hot Job Openings!
Get talk time of 200 minutes
absolutely free
Hot Travel Deals
- Yatra.com
Send Gifts
Flowers and Gifts
The smartest way
to call india