DEBATE: SMALL & MEDIUM ENTERPRISES

On supplier cartels and input import


Posted: Friday, Aug 19, 2005 at 0125 hrs IST
Updated: Friday, Aug 19, 2005 at 0125 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

: Steel companies have formed a cartel in India and keep their prices higher than the international level. Their quality is poor as well. In Punjab, we have tried to import steel, but there are several problems in doing so. I would be grateful if you could tell us if their cartel could be broken. How should we cope?

—Wonder Handtools, Jalandhar

The question you have raised is very important, but does not have a straight answer. The future competitive challenge for SMEs would be greatly defined by their ability to fight and correct market distortions. This needs to be seen by industry as well as policy makers in the larger dimension of the new world trading environment. Earlier, in the closed economic environment, imports were restricted thanks to QRs. Small firms competed with small (no entry barriers, but there was reservation) and large ones were kept out (entry barriers with strict licensing).

Today, small companies have to compete with large enterprises, not only Indian, but also foreign. Being small has some advantages— flexibility, ability to customise and quick response time—that help them cope with competition. But if factor markets do not function efficiently, the advantages of large size far outweigh any advantages inherent in a firm’s small size.

Under such conditions, small companies incur a much higher cost for finance, energy and inputs, besides the cost of compliance with the regulatory environment. Policymakers are somewhat sensitive to the issues of finance and energy, but have not been able to appreciate the impact of cost and availability of raw materials.

The primary producers of raw material in this case, steel, are large capital-intensive global enterprises. There have been numerous instances when these producers formed cartels and influenced global prices. Therefore, most developed countries have established strict anti-trust laws or competition policies to reign in cartels and anti-competitive behaviour.

However, national laws have increasingly proved ineffective against international cartels. That is why a multilateral competition policy in WTO was considered.

Incidentally, India has been one of the most vociferous critics of competition policy in WTO! Here, it is widely perceived that during the past two-three years, the steel markets were distorted by cartel formation, which manipulated demand and supply to create temporary scarcity and used anti-dumping duties against cheap imports to make these expensive. Though steel is used by large industries too, they are not affected much, as they are allowed to enter into...

More from

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you