Is S Tel paying the price for taking DoT to court?

Rishi Raj, Anandita Singh Mankotia
Posted: Tuesday, Mar 09, 2010 at 2359 hrs IST
Updated: Tuesday, Mar 09, 2010 at 0050 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

New Delhi: The department of telecommunications has overstepped its jurisdiction in asking new telecom service provider S Tel to stop services in three circles on grounds of national security, say analysts. Observers do not rule out the possibility of scores being settled as the company has embarrassed telecom minister A Raja in the alleged spectrum controversy, which is being investigated by the CBI.

However, DoT and S Tel officials said on Monday that talks were still on to resolve the matter.

Former DoT secretaries with whom FE spoke said that such a step was unwarranted and though the department may have acted according to the letter of the law, it was not in the right spirit but none of them were willing to come on record. The officials have a point—ever since the opening of the telecom sector to private players in 1995 it is for the first time that the services of any operator been suspended using the bogey of national security, though some glitches have been found in the operations of some service providers time and again but DoT has often given them time to comply with the norms rather than taking the extreme step of suspending the operations that left the subscribers in the lurch.

As a licensor, DoT has overriding powers to suspend the services of any operator or cancel the licence on national security concerns, and—here it has blanket powers—it does not need to issue any show-cause notice. However, the powers have never been invoked in its extreme form.

DoT officials told FE that S Tel did not provide the facility of lawful interception to the intelligence agencies.

However, if that’s the case it has a precedent in the BlackBerry issue, where it was discovered in 2008 that the technology provider, Canada’s Research In Motion (RIM), did not provide for lawful interception. By that time three major service providers were offering BlackBerry services in the country and never were their services barred. Interestingly, some months later the whole security issue was glossed over and the BlackBerry services continue as before.

In fact, last year even state-owned service providers like BSNL and MTNL began their 3G services without providing for call monitoring services to the intelligence agencies but their services were not stopped.

S Tel is promoted by C Sivasankaran with 49% equity by Bahrain Telecommunications and the company dragged the DoT to the...

More from Frontpage

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you