FE Editorial : Shooting directors

The Financial Express

Posted: Tuesday, Jan 06, 2009 at 2214 hrs IST
Updated: Tuesday, Jan 06, 2009 at 2214 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

: The deadline for corporate India to populate at least half of their boardroom with independent directors passed in January 2007. For unlisted companies, the percentage required is one-third, under company law. The stock market regulator, Securities & Exchange Board of India (Sebi), had said it would penalise listed companies that failed to do so before the audited results for the March quarter were out. But despite such an order, the regulator has not penalised any company so far. The reasons are not because of any weakness of Sebi. It is simply because the basket of people available to become independent directors on boards of companies is very small. Since there is a limit on the number of companies that one can become a board member of, the problem is compounded further.

Into this story, the inexplicable lookout notice served by the Hyderabad police on Nimesh Kampani has pushed one of the biggest reforms in corporate governance in India back several years. The case, as this paper has highlighted, involved Nagarjuna Finance Ltd, based in Hyderabad, which was allegedly unable to pay back deposits collected from the public about ten years ago. In a bizarre turn of events, the city police, while arresting the CEO and one of its executive directors, have also served a lookout notice on Mr Kampani. His fault? He served on the board as an independent director. So, even though he had quit a year before the default, the police in its wisdom decided there was a fit case ten years later to raid Mr Kampani’s residence in Mumbai on New Year’s eve and proclaim him an absconder. If persons of the calibre of Mr Kampani are hounded as criminals for something with which they are plainly not responsible, the chances of any eminent persons agreeing to sit on company boards are zero. Yet, as has been argued by this newspaper, the biggest safety net for upholding shareholder rights is the institution of independent directors. Segments of Indian business have long been a prey to evils like filling up boardrooms with relatives of the management. This often allowed them to get away, despite misuse of shareholder wealth. Independent directors are, therefore, starting to play a very critical role. Just one look at the Satyam story in the same city will make it clear how critical that role is.

More from Edit & Column

Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» independent directors
Posted by M S R on 2009-01-07 11:29:20.869906+05:30
Your editorial is totally sidelining independent directors, What happened in Satyam? Inflated figures in the Balance sheet. Who is responsible for this ? Is it only executive directors. If it is so then what is the role of independent directors. Is it that they attend board meetings just like that and walkaway.

» Independent Directors?
Posted by S.C. Aggarwal on 2009-01-06 19:15:48.438615+05:30
I donot what are you are writing in your editorial "Shooting Directors" FE (Jan 6). Do you have sympathy with Mr. Kampani or with independent directors or with the investors or with promotors? You have said that Independent Directors are, starting to play a very critical role and you have quoted the case of Satyam. I do not know what role has been played by the socalled independent directors in Satyam Case? Every one is quite aware that there were four independent directors who were very eminent people but have now resigned when there was socalled trouble in Satyam. Resignation is no solution. Independent directors are nothing but show pieces on the board of directors of a company. Kampani was a director in Nagarajun Finance and because of his position on the board of directors people deposited their money with Nagarjun. Had Mr. Kampani not been a Director when Nagarjun Finance was accepting deposits from the people, the company would not have been successful in collecting so much money from the public. Hence every director is responsible and is supposed to be involved in the crime the company had created at any time. To save Mr. Kampani and others let there be an amendment in the company Act that except the promotor none will be held responsible for any crime the crime has committed. It is necessary to understand the ground reality that CFO, CEO or company secretary or director cannot afford to disobey the wishes ofthe promotor. S.C. Aggarwal,Founder, Poverty Trust.New Delhi 1110076

Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you