FE Editorial : Marathi pride & economic downfall

The Financial Express

Posted: Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 2142 hrs IST
Updated: Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 2142 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss
  • Discount UK Shopping

: Even by its own extraordinary standards of rowdiness, the MNS has hit a new low in Maharashtra. Protesting SP leader Abu Asim Azmi taking his oath in Hindi, MNS legislators manhandled him. But to anyone who has followed MNS chief Raj Thackeray’s rise to power on the back of an anti-immigration rant shouldn’t be surprised. To anyone whose historical sense further factors in how Raj’s precursor rose to power by ranting against south Indians and Gujaratis living in Mumbai, the sense of déjà vu should be even stronger. Actually, the only surprising thing is how, in the face of all the facts proving the economic benefits of migration, ‘sons of soil’ politics still rules the roost in India’s financial capital. Take this year’s Human Development Report, for example. It underlines a substantial fall in poverty rates for households that have at least one member who has moved elsewhere within the country. In Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, poverty rates in households with one migrant fell by about half between 2001-02 and 2006-07. None of this is likely to impress Raj, who couldn’t care less about how source communities may be benefiting from migration. He couldn’t care less that Mumbai’s trademark cosmopolitanism is the result of this migratory mix. But, if he cares about Mumbai, shouldn’t he at least be attending to how the city’s lungs would choke for want of migratory oxygen? As The Indian Express reported yesterday, whether it’s the construction business in big cities like Mumbai or the likes of Pune vineyards, all kinds of Maharashtra enterprises rely on labour from Bihar and elsewhere. Conflicting Raj’s claims, these disparate business owners would surely have been employing local labour if it was available or was cost-effective. Plus, the evidence suggests that rather than crowding out locals from the job market, migrants boost economic output and help improve rates of investment in new businesses.

Even those who tried to protect Azmi from the MNS assault were subjected to unconscionable battery on the floor of the House. As a consequence, four MNS MLAs were suspended following an Assembly resolution, calling their actions extremely shameful. What we must underline is that rival parties haven’t responded in admirable fashion. There is the Shiv Sena, which the MNS has been giving a real good run for grubby money, whose chief Bal Thackeray has tried to recover Marathi manoos ground by saying that his partymen...

More from Edit & Column

Single Page Format 1 - 2 - Next
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Unity in Diversity: A Myth?
Posted by Dr B Sundara on 2009-11-11 09:31:53.886232+05:30
%u201CUnity in Diversity%u201D is a Myth. %u201CUnity in diversity%u201D is turning out a myth in India if one sees the ugly incidents in the name of language. The elected people%u2019s representatives fighting in the august premises of the Assembly in Maharashtra for the sake of language makes one feel sick. Diversity is being misused to further individual group interests and create chaotic situation and promote narrow political interests. We have to promote and help in the growth of our language. But this is certainly not the way to do it. Our love for our mother tongues is bordering fanaticism. We are taking our diversity too far. It would be dangerous to continue with the myth. Instead, sooner we take action to see commonality prevails over diversity better it will be for the country. Promoting commonality is the only answer to the kind of divisions taking place in the name of region, religion, language, etc. What is the meaning of celebrating diversity when we fight with this kind of fanaticism over language and region? As rightly pointed out in the editorial, the economic prosperity of our metros or even small cities depends on the hard labour of migrant workers. Even some of the big industrialists are from various parts of the country. How we can discriminate them and still aspire for growth. For true national integration regional love should not be a hindrance. India was a collection of Kingdoms, most often fighting themselves. Somehow the British rule forced us to come together and win freedom. But with kind of divisions taking place and the way we are fighting in the name of various diversities (about which we are proud of), it is doubtful how long the country can remain united and strong. Our internal squabbles will weaken us and derail the progress. And the external forces will take advantage of our vulnerable situation. In fact already the process appears to be on. It is high time that the political, social and religious leaders take effective steps to unite the nation with common binding factors. We may have to identify commonalities that already exist and also may have to evolve new commonalities; and promoting commonalities is the only way to remain united. So %u201Ccommonality for unity%u201D may be the new mantra that we should be saying.

Express Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you