Indian Express

Express India

Screen

Loksatta

Express Cricket

Kashmir Live

Biz Publications
 
| Make this your homepage | RSS

TODAY'S COLUMNIST

Column: What now, UPA?

Ajay Shah

Posted: 2008-07-24 13:37:31+05:30 IST
Updated: Jul 24, 2008 at 1337 hrs IST

: for adhering to principles, which is a more demanding system of regulation as compared with check-box compliance of detailed regulatory checklists.

4. Inadequacies of financial firms: Financial firms in India are inadequate midgets, either by international standards or when compared with the needs of the new India. This is largely a consequence of the three difficulties described above. The way forward lies in multi-product conglomerates, such as ICICI or HDFC, which derive size and sophistication from operating in all areas of finance. This requires breaking the ‘silo system’ of Indian finance, where each regulator has a feudal notion of the companies that it ‘controls’. This silo system needs to give way to a financial holding company framework. ICICI Holding Company should be the corporate headquarters, that is only subject to company law (and listing agreements). It should control a series of subsidiaries in various fields, while retaining a coordinated group-wide product strategy.

5. Tax distortions: There are three big flaws in tax policy. The first is taxation of transactions at various points. This must give way to the VAT principle, as has been done with great success for goods. The second is the lack of pass-through in fund management. This is a core principle of tax policy: whether person X manages his own money or hires person Y to be his fund manager, nothing should change about the tax treatment of X. The third problem is the partial double-taxation of corporations. The logically sound level of dividend taxation is zero.

6. Capital controls: Capital controls are to finance what tariffs or quantitative restrictions are to physical goods. Sophisticated and competitive corporations came about in India only when tariffs and QRs were largely removed. In similar fashion, the removal of capital controls is of critical importance to placing Indian financial firms under competitive pressure, which would then produce competence and dynamism.

7. Outward orientation of financial firms: In the real economy, trade barriers have been removed, barriers to FDI have been removed, and Indian firms are now turning into multinationals. Such dynamism is the best way of ensuring that India achieves high growth, where Indian consumers are able to buy world class motorcycles or telephones. These three changes are now required in finance. Indian financial firms must face competition (through removal of capital controls and removal of barriers to FDI) and the best Indian financial firms should start turning into multinationals...

Single Page Format Previous - 1 - 2 - 3 - Next
Ads by Google
Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
» Economic Reforms
Posted by K.K.Ammannaya on 2008-07-24 19:14:47.463599+05:30
The success of Manamohan Singh led UPA government in trust vote is good for India in many ways.Dr Singh is India's first professional PM and he has no axe to grind in any matter .He is objective,very transparent and inetgrity is a very strong point in his personal character while this is the weakest point in other leaders.Dr Singh has long range economic vision.He was architect of reforms in India.Till Jan 2007 India was doing well on all fronts except farm sector.As left came in the way of performance by stalling all reforms and growth spurring initiatives India lost many oppotunities.Busineess confidence and optimism of the economy declined and growth rate too started to decline.Left is reason for this.Dr.Singh 's statement that he was treated like a bondedlabourer by left indicates his pain.Now Dr Singh must restart all pending reforms and give a big push to the economy along with nuke deal operationalisation.This will bring about great growth and Dr.Singh will create history.

20% Cash back on hotels
- Yatra.com
Send Gifts
Flowers and Gifts