An inconsequential move for the sector

Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

: Protection to small-scale industries (SSIs) in India was historically provided through two sets of policy instruments. The policy of reservation provided that a certain number of products could only be manufactured by SSIs. That was to protect them from large Indian companies. The reservation process began in 1967 with 47 items and peaked to 873 in 1984. The tide has turned since 1997, however, and the number of reserved products today stands at 114.

The second policy was through trade: quantitative restrictions (QRs) on imports, high import duties and restrictive FDI limits. This was targeted at foreign companies to protect the Indian SSI sector. QRs have been removed and import duties brought down systematically since 1991. But the FDI clause remained. The FDI limit was an integral part of the classical definition of an SSI.

Another development in the meantime has been that the sector was re-christened the micro, small & medium enterprises (MSME) sector with the enactment of the MSME Development Act, 2006. The definition of an MSME now falls in the domain of this Act, which ostensibly includes the FDI limit as well.

But on practical grounds, what does that mean for small-scale units, which are in either non-reserved or reserved categories? Let’s examine what happens if a foreign or domestic company invests more than 24% in a small unit not in the reserved category. This is the scenario for a bulk of the sector, which churns out 8,000 products of which only 114 are reserved. If more than 24% is invested in the small unit, it will cease to be a registered SME.

What do you lose? There are two major benefits that one can claim when registered as an SME: the option of excise exemption up to a turnover of Rs 1 crore and coverage under priority sector lending. Firstly, no progressive company can really do without CenVat from the beginning and excise exemption is hardly an incentive.