3 NGOs File Petition Against Wheat Patent For Monsanto


Posted: Wednesday, Jan 28, 2004 at 0000 hrs IST
Updated: Wednesday, Jan 28, 2004 at 0000 hrs IST


Font Size

Print

Feedback

Email

Discuss

New Delhi, Jan 27: : International non-government organisation (NGO) Greenpeace alongwith Indian organisations like Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology (RFSTE) and Bharat Krishak Samaj (BKS) on Tuesday filed a petition at the European Patent Office (EPO), Munich, challenging the patent rights given to Monsanto on Indian landrace of wheat, Nap Hal.

Patent expert Christoph Then, Aseesh Tayal of Greenpeace-India, Vandana Shiva of RFSTE and Krishna Bir Choudhary of BKS jointly signed the petition.

Monsanto, on the other hand defended its move and RanJana Smetacek of the company’s India unit speaking to FE said, “The patent in question relates to an Indian landrace, Nap Hal. This patent right was filed by Unilever in 1990. In 1998 Unilever’s wheat division was acquired by Monsanto and hence the patent right was transferred to Monsanto. Unilever sourced the genes of Nap Hal from gene banks in the multilateral system (MLS). The original patent claimed to use the variety for processing bread in Europe. Now that Monsanto has withdrawn from its cereal business in Europe in mid-October, 2003, this patent no longer holds good.”

According to the press release issued by Greenpeace, “the patented variety of wheat with specific baking characteristics of flour derived from it was originally developed in India and has been cultivated, bred and processed for bread (Chapatis) by Indian farmers for years. The patent that Monsanto now holds means it has the monopoly on farming, breeding and processing of this type of wheat. The patent (EP 445929) was granted on May 21, 2003 by EPO, Munich.”

According to the European Patents Convention, patents cannot be issued on plants that are normally cultivated, any more than they are allowed to be issued on their seeds. In case of the Monsanto wheat patent, the EPO has clearly disregarded rules and law, the press release said.

Dr Aseesh Tayal of Greenpeace India said “the patent is a blatant example of biopiracy as it tantamounts to theft of the results of the breeding efforts of Indian farmers.

More from Economy

Discuss this story on expressindia forums

Post Comments

Comments: (Limit 3,000 characters)
Name
Message
Email ID
Subject
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.

Comments
Flowers & Cakes DeliveryExpress Classifieds
Post and view free classifieds ad
Express Astrology
Know what's in the stars for you