1. Four ways to avoid murdering a great ad

Four ways to avoid murdering a great ad

Advertising is part science and part acumen, but most of all it is about a winning creative idea. Now, generating a great creative idea depends on individual brilliance, which needs the right-brain function — creative, intuitive and subjective.

Published: November 15, 2016 6:05 AM
The best creative ideas and their execution this world has seen, whether art, cinema, music, writing, even scientific inventions, have come from individuals who dream, conceptualise and execute them to perfection. The best creative ideas and their execution this world has seen, whether art, cinema, music, writing, even scientific inventions, have come from individuals who dream, conceptualise and execute them to perfection.

Advertising is part science and part acumen, but most of all it is about a winning creative idea. Now, generating a great creative idea depends on individual brilliance, which needs the right-brain function — creative, intuitive and subjective. The best creative ideas and their execution this world has seen, whether art, cinema, music, writing, even scientific inventions, have come from individuals who dream, conceptualise and execute them to perfection.

On the other hand business and brand management in companies have evolved to be more left-brained functions — analytical, logical and objective. Hence, you need to work in teams with defined hierarchies and cross-functional co-dependence. Management processes, therefore, lean toward taking multiple inputs and approvals, clear cut division of tasks and getting a consensus.

The above two — creativity and management — are very different in approach and purpose, and the challenge is to make them work together when it comes to designing campaigns. I have often found that companies end up marrying the two — taking a consensus approach to evaluating advertising. The results then are at best imperfect message delivery and at worst creative hara-kiri.

Why does that spell disaster? Democracy by nature functions by taking all constituents into account and more often than not works through creating compromises. This leaves little room for individual brilliance to shine and deliver. How then should brand management approach this sticky issue? Here are four ideas to manage a campaign and yet not stifle true creativity:

1. Agree on a single-minded brand proposition and key messages before briefing the agency. This is internal and has nothing to do with the agency to begin with. The brand manager must get all important stakeholders aligned — sales, product, marketing director, CEO — to the core message/s before the agency is briefed. While briefing, agree with the agency on the broad creative strategy, brand personality, tone, etc and update leaders of stakeholding teams about these aspects. Once the agency starts coming with creative ideas on the campaign, there must be no new debates about these basics.

2. Don’t subject creative ideas to a committee. It is a fact that more than 75% of the people in a company fancy themselves as marketers. And when it comes to advertising, 100% of the people believe they are geniuses. It’s also true that they’re not! So, if you’re going to have 15 people sit and discuss a storyboard where everyone gets a say, that’s like throwing a cow into a river full of piranhas. It’s one thing to show an idea to people to quickly assess whether it works in the desired way or not, and an altogether another thing to give many people the power to vote and demand changes as if it’s their right. The brand manager needs to take inputs, distill the valuable insights and decide for herself what tweaks to make. And she must be empowered to work this way.

3. Get consumer response, but don’t follow them blindly. The key word is response, not opinion. At any of the stages of creative development, the consumer should respond to a stimulus so that the brand manager and agency know what’s working and what’s not. The consumer does not know your objective or strategy, or the insight that you’re working with, and hence, is never meant to give you a thought-through input. That’s not her role.

Democracy gets even worse when you start expecting decisions from consumers instead of their reactions. Also, do not fall into the trap of expecting your research agency to take your decisions for you. Their role is to cull the insights on how consumers think and behave and react, with some recommendations. It is for the brand manager to synthesise all this and take the decisions.

4. Finally, err on the side of risk. If you started off with wanting great cut-through and an insightful piece of ad campaign, you will have to take the risk of accepting that which is not necessarily approved by the majority. As long as the intended message is being communicated, take that risk and go against what your committee is saying.

It is true that all the above is easier said than done. The process of decision making is determined largely by company culture, established internal practices and maturity levels of stakeholders. Because of the relatively subjective nature, marketing and advertising will always have more input givers than you care to have. But think of it this way — sales works in the way sales objectives are met; finance works in the way that financial objectives are achieved; then why shouldn’t the brand manager work in the way that brand objectives are best met?

The author, LK Gupta is CMO, GirnarSoft

Please Wait while comments are loading...

Go to Top