1. In social networks, ‘bigger isn’t better’ as ‘smaller is smarter’

In social networks, ‘bigger isn’t better’ as ‘smaller is smarter’

A new study has revealed that "smaller is smarter" when it comes to influential superspreaders of information in social networks.

By: | Published: July 2, 2015 2:12 PM

A new study has revealed that “smaller is smarter” when it comes to influential superspreaders of information in social networks.

City College of New York physicists Flaviano Morone and Hernan A. Makse say that this is a major shift from the widely held view that “bigger is better” and could have important consequences for a broad range of social, natural and living networked systems.

The problem of identifying the minimal set of influential nodes in complex networks for maximizing viral marketing in social media, optimizing immunization campaigns and protecting networks under attack is one of the most studied problems in network science, said Makse, adding that so far, only intuitive strategies based mainly on attacking the hubs to identify crucial nodes have been developed.

Morone and Makse set about to solve the problem by applying what they described as “rigorous theoretical solutions and systematic benchmarking.” They also proposed a scalable algorithm, called Collective Influence algorithm, that they believe beats all the competing methods in massively large-scale social networks like Twitter and Facebook with more than 100 million users.

Through rigorous mathematical calculations, employing optimal percolation and state-of-the-art spin glass theory, they solved the optimal collective influence problem in random networks, said Morone. They show that the set of optimal superspreaders radically differ and is much smaller than that obtained by all previous heuristics rankings, including PageRank, the basis of Google.

As per the CCNY researchers, their theory shows that top influencers are highly counterintuitive: weakly connected people strategically surrounded by hierarchical coronas of hubs (see image) are the most powerful influencers. Thus, their work provides a theoretical revision to the current view on influence, marking a paradigm shift from “bigger is better” to “smaller is smarter.”

These results will appeal to an extensive range of scientists in fields such as networks, physics, mathematics, epidemiology, marketing, as well as to officials monitoring the spread of contagious diseases like the Ebola outbreak, added Makse.

The study appears in Nature.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top