The Children’s Investment Fund Management (TCI) has taken a stake in SABMiller, the second activist to buy into the brewer in recent weeks, raising the prospect of a late push for improved takeover terms from AB InBev.
The move by TCI comes ahead of SABMiller’s annual meeting in London on Thursday when investors could question terms of a $100 billion-plus deal that now appear to favour its two largest shareholders after a steep drop in the value of sterling.
British-based TCI, best known for its investments in troubled carmaker Volkswagen and French aerospace group Safran, has acquired just under 1 percent of SABMiller’s stock, a source familiar with the matter said.
TCI’s acquisition of a small stake follows news that fellow hedge fund Elliott Advisors had taken a 1.3 percent stake in the London-listed maker of beers like Peroni and Grolsch, which it later raised to about 1.5 percent, regulatory filings showed.
The appearance of two of the world’s most powerful activists on the SABMiller shareholder register has prompted talk among some institutional investors that Elliott and TCI could lead a push for AB InBev to improve its 44 pounds-per-share cash offer, aimed at the majority of shareholders.
SAB shares traded at 44.31 pounds at 1130 GMT on Monday.
The source declined to describe the motives or rationale behind TCI’s stakebuilding, but did say the hedge fund “obviously has an interest in the deal and how it pans out”.
TCI and SABMiller declined to comment.
The main offer is now lower than a special cash-and-stock offer designed for SAB’s biggest two investors, cigarette maker Altria and Colombia’s Santo Domingo family, who together own about 40 percent of the company.
When the deal was announced in November, that partial share alternative — which avoids triggering large tax bills — was worth about 39 pounds. But the recent fall in the pound and rise in ABI’s shares have increased its value to about 51 pounds.
ROCK THE BOAT?
“Given all the regulatory hoops that the deal has already had to jump through it might be dangerous to rock the boat too much, but Elliott must have taken a view that they can get the offer upped without altering the timetable of the deal materially,” one of SAB’s top 15 investors told Reuters.
Investor advisor Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. has written to clients to point out the relative improvement in the value of the partial share alternative, noting that it now represents a 16 percent premium to the broader offer, instead of a 4.9 percent discount.
It also pointed out that while the alternative offer was technically open to all investors, it seemed “designed to be unappealing” to most fund managers since the shares are unlisted and cannot be traded for five years.
The deal is currently structured as a “scheme of arrangement” which requires approval by 75 percent of SAB’s shareholders. The vote is expected to take place only once outstanding antitrust approvals have been granted.
Another source close to the deal suggested the activists might struggle to garner enough support among SAB shareholders to call for a rewrite of the terms at this late stage, especially since the deal has already received two of the four required approvals from European and South African regulators.
“It’s a dangerous game and there’s no certainty that ABI is willing to raise its offer,” the source said.
“The pound is going back up and this plays in favour of the existing arrangement…Shareholders want to get this deal done.”