1. Singur land case: Our case relating to Singur Act of 2011 yet to be heard, says Tata Motors

Singur land case: Our case relating to Singur Act of 2011 yet to be heard, says Tata Motors

Reacting to the Supreme Court verdict on the Singur land acquisition, Tata Motors has said, "Our case relating to Singur Act of 2011, is yet to be heard by the Supreme Court.

By: | Published: August 31, 2016 5:13 PM
Singur Supreme Court, Singur, Singur case, Singur Supreme Court, singur supreme court ruling Tata Motors said: We will study today’s judgement before commenting further. (Reuters Photo)

Reacting to the Supreme Court verdict on the Singur land acquisition, Tata Motors has said, “Our case relating to Singur Act of 2011, is yet to be heard by the Supreme Court. We will study today’s judgement before commenting further.” The Supreme Court today set aside the controversial acquisition of almost 1,000 acres of land in Singur in 2006 by the then Left Front government in West Bengal. The acquisition was made to set up Tata Motors’ Nano car manufacturing plant. The verdict is being seen as a huge setback for Tata Motors. It was delivered by a bench of Justices V Gopala Gowda and Arun Mishra.

West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee has hailed the Supreme Court judgement on the Singur land acquisition case, calling it a landmark victory of the farmers. “We waited for ten years for this judgement. It is a victory of the farmers,” she said. “We will hold a strategy meeting tomorrow on how to implement the SC verdict and will work out a mechanism to return land to the farmers,” she assured. Banerjee went on to say, “I had dreamt of this SC verdict for so long. This is for the people of Singur. Now I can die in peace.” “Right now I am remembering those people who made sacrifices fighting for this. Everyone should celebrate this as Singur utsav, it’s like an invocation of the celebration to Durga Puja,” Banerjee said.

Finding fault with the land acquisition process, the apex court said that the acquired land should be returned to the cultivators within 12 weeks from today. “Compensation to land owners/cultivators will not be returned to government as they did not use the land for 10 years,” the apex court said. Setting aside the Calcutta High Court verdict, the SC said that the land acquisition collector did not properly conduct the inquiry into the complaints of cultivators with regard to acquisition of plots. “The acquisition of land by the state for a company does not fall under the purview of public purpose,” the court said.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top