1. Sahara group’s Subrata Roy get-out-of-jail deal is mired in mystery

Sahara group’s Subrata Roy get-out-of-jail deal is mired in mystery

Subrata Roy, the boss of Indian conglomerate Sahara Group, is in a New Delhi prison on contempt-of-court charges and needs..,

By: | New York/mumbai | Published: February 5, 2015 9:50 AM
Subrata Roy, Subrata Roy Sahara Group, Subrata Roy bail, Subrata Roy Tihar jail, Subrata Roy overseas hotels, Subrata Roy New York Plaza, Subrata Roy news

Subrata Roy is in Tihar jail on contempt-of-court charges and needs to post .6 billion in bail to get out. (Reuters)

Subrata Roy, the boss of Indian conglomerate Sahara Group, is in a New Delhi prison on contempt-of-court charges and needs to post $1.6 billion in bail to get out. To help raise the money, Sahara is in talks to refinance its overseas hotels, including New York’s Plaza.

The only problem: It’s unclear if the man who’s orchestrating the deal, a 34-year-old former broker named Saransh Sharma, has the money to pull it off.

Sahara’s head of corporate finance, Sandeep Wadhwa, said Sahara’s lawyers had verified with Bank of America that Sharma has deposited just over $1 billion in an account at the bank that is “earmarked for the said transaction.”

That account, however, doesn’t appear to exist. A manager at the bank told Reuters that he didn’t write a crucial document attributed to him: an email, sent in his name to Sahara, which purported to verify the account’s existence. After Reuters asked the bank to look into the account, spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens issued a statement saying: “Bank of America isn’t involved in the transaction.”

What’s more, Sharma, who lives in San Jose, California, has admitted to stealing a database from a former employer. There are also two pending lawsuits against him alleging he forged a letter and produced fake documents to obtain a loan.

Bank of America’s assertion that it has nothing to do with the deal, as well as details about Sharma’s past, could throw a wrench into Sahara’s efforts to free Roy in a case that has made headlines in India for almost a year.

Roy is being held at Tihar jail, the largest in India, on contempt charges for failing to comply with a court order to repay investors in a bond scheme later ruled to be illegal. The bail amount, the largest ever in India, reflects the cost of the illegal scheme, estimated by Indian regulators to be as much as $7 billion.

A lawyer working for Sahara, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the company’s lawyers had not separately checked with Bank of America to see whether Sharma had a billion-dollar account with the bank. Instead, the lawyer said, Sahara relied on a letter from the bank saying the funds were there. Sahara declined to comment on the lawyer’s assertion.

Sharma told Reuters he is backed by a group of U.S. and U.K. investors for the refinancing and that the funds in the account have come from them. Both he and Sahara declined to identify the investors.

Sharma, who spoke with Reuters on Jan. 23 and sent a subsequent email on Jan. 28, said in an emailed statement on Wednesday that Mirach had faced “a number of challenges in closing this transaction” and that he wouldn’t disclose “sensitive details” about the deal until it closes.

Under the proposed deal, which Sharma said he reached with Sahara in December, Sharma’s investor group would help pay off about $880 million of a Bank of China loan for the hotels. Besides the Plaza, which Sahara bought for about $570 million in 2012, the properties also include the Dream Hotel in downtown New York and the Grosvenor House in London.

Sharma and the investor group also agreed to lend $650 million to Sahara and make a $450 million investment in the conglomerate’s properties in India. Sahara and Sharma have said they expect to finalize the deal by Feb. 20.

It is unclear how paying off the Bank of China loan, or obtaining the loan and investment, would help Sahara pay Roy’s bail and refund money to the bond investors.

Sahara’s businesses range from financial services to media, retail and real estate. The company used to sponsor the Indian cricket team, which helped to make it a household name in the country. During his heyday, Roy, 66, socialized with presidents and film stars. Seen as a maverick among India’s conservative business elite, his self-appointed title is “Managing Worker,” and he’s known in the company as “Saharasri,” or “Mr. Sahara.”

Sahara’s troubles started in 2011 when it was found by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the market regulator, to have illegally sold billions of dollars of bonds to investors. After a legal battle that reached the Indian Supreme Court, Sahara was ordered to refund investors the money.

The Supreme Court threw Roy in jail last March after he failed to appear at a contempt hearing related to the dispute with the regulator and set his $1.6 billion bail. Sahara has said that it has repaid most investors, a claim SEBI has disputed.

Since Roy’s imprisonment, Sahara has been trying to raise cash. It has been reporting its progress to the court and regulators, and needs approvals from them to do these transactions.

Sahara told the Supreme Court last month that it is in talks with Mirach Capital, the company Sharma set up to do the deal with Sahara. Sahara has shown the court a Jan. 5 letter from Bank of America, saying it is holding $1.05 billion in funds in an account on behalf of Mirach Capital for Sahara, according to a court filing. Sahara and Sharma declined to show Reuters a copy of the letter.


Reuters has seen an email, dated Dec. 17, sent in the name of Nuno Marques, a Bank of America banking center manager in Wellington, Florida, to Sahara finance executive Wadhwa. In the email, the writer attests that Mirach “has sufficient liquidity with Bank of America to undertake the said transactions” with Sahara. The email does not specify the amount of funds Mirach has, but says the money would be put into escrow after anti-money laundering-related checks.

Marques, contacted by Reuters for comment on Feb. 3 at his office in Florida, denied having written the Dec. 17 e-mail. He said he had been called by another Bank of America employee to verify whether there were Mirach Capital funds on deposit and that he told her he couldn’t do so.

Sahara declined to comment further, saying it was bound by “strict confidentiality provisions” as part of the talks with Mirach.

Shekhar Naphade, an independent lawyer advising the Indian Supreme Court on the case against Roy, said he had “no concrete details about the Bank of America escrow account” beyond the letter submitted by Sahara. Naphade said he didn’t have the means to independently verify the claim made by Sharma about the bank account.

Sources familiar with the Reserve Bank of India’s investigations into Sahara said the regulator had not received a request from the Supreme Court to probe whether the money is in the Bank of America account, but was making some initial checks of its own.

Sources familiar with SEBI said if the hotel deal does not go through, Indian government officials would seize and sell Sahara assets, including its hotels and properties, to raise cash.


Sharma has spent the past decade working on and off for small independent brokerages in the United States, a Reuters review of U.S. regulatory filings shows.

He said in an interview that he had experience “transacting several multibillion dollar deals.” He declined to give details, however, and said he had not successfully completed such deals before.

In 2013, Sharma sued a U.S. hedge fund for alleged breach of contract. In a Dec. 15, 2013, deposition in a New York federal civil court case, Sharma admitted to fabricating an email; to selling for $10,000 a database of contacts he stole from a previous employer, the investment bank AllianceBernstein; and to lying about the sources of funds he had obtained. A spokesman for AllianceBernstein declined to comment.

Calculate your income tax post budget 2018 through this Income Tax Calculator, get latest news on Budget 2018 and Auto Expo 2018. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

  1. A
    Aakriti Kaul
    Feb 5, 2015 at 6:56 pm
    Supreme court has already asked RBI to look into the matter which is a competent agency for such transactions. Why media is in a hurry to draw its own conclusion...is something fishy here...I suspect someone trying to sabotage the deal...
    1. P
      Priyanka Agarwal
      Feb 5, 2015 at 5:32 pm
      How predictable has this pattern become? As soon as the #subrataroy 's bail comes up for hearing these negative articles crop up out of nowhere.
      1. P
        Priyanka Agarwal
        Feb 5, 2015 at 5:36 pm
        No prizes for guessing. These negative stories had to start coming up, after all this is what has happened every time the sahara lawyers have been putting up Subrata roy's bail application
        1. S
          Sonali Gupta
          Feb 5, 2015 at 6:55 pm
          No bank discloses the name of its account holders and their transactions, I don't see any point why Bank of America should tell the details of Mirach Capital to journalist...are they jumping to the conclusion.
          1. K
            Kanika Mathur
            Feb 5, 2015 at 7:39 pm
            As a seller of the properties Sahara has done the verification with its limited capabilities and submitted doents related with deal to RBI for further due deligance...lets see what happens...
            1. P
              Prachi Sharma
              Feb 5, 2015 at 6:59 pm
              Saransh Sharma should clear his stand on the deal...the fate of chairman of such a big conglomerate like Sahara is depending on this deal.
              1. S
                Sarika Khanna
                Feb 5, 2015 at 7:01 pm
                Let the deal proceed, everyone will come to know the fact about it, why are these reporters are in hurry when India's biggest consutional body Supreme Court is looking after it...
                1. S
                  Shweta Dhar
                  Feb 5, 2015 at 7:28 pm
                  It seems that some other businessman is interested to buy these properties because whenever deal seems to be done some kind of issue arises...earlier when the deal was in advance stage with Sulatn of Brunei...all of sudden that sharia law issue was arrived...which was very much appeared as crafted with some other motive...now again when the deal was about to struck someone is trying to sabotage it...
                  1. Load More Comments

                  Go to Top