1. Ratan Tata vs Cyrus Mistry: Tata Group gets HC relief in Rs 41,000 cr case as earlier order withdrawn

Ratan Tata vs Cyrus Mistry: Tata Group gets HC relief in Rs 41,000 cr case as earlier order withdrawn

Spelling relief for the Tata Group, the Bombay High Court on Monday revoked its earlier order and stated it cannot hear a suit filed by minority shareholders of the group seeking Rs 41,000 crore in damages as a representative suit on behalf of all non-promoter shareholders.

By: | Published: July 11, 2017 7:08 AM
Ratan Tata vs Cyrus Mistry, Ratan Tata vs Cyrus Mistry news, Ratan Tata vs Cyrus Mistry latest news, tata mistry news, tata news, tata sons news, bombay high court The suit, filed by shareholders Pramod Shah and five others, challenged Cyrus Mistry’s removal as chairman of the Tata group, terming it “illegal, motivated and malafide”. (PTI)

Spelling relief for the Tata Group, the Bombay High Court on Monday revoked its earlier order and stated it cannot hear a suit filed by minority shareholders of the group seeking Rs 41,000 crore in damages as a representative suit on behalf of all non-promoter shareholders. The suit, filed by shareholders Pramod Shah and five others, challenged Cyrus Mistry’s removal as chairman of the Tata group, terming it “illegal, motivated and malafide”. In December 2016, justice SJ Kathawalla had passed an order permitting the suit to be filed in a representative capacity. The permission was on Monday revoked by justice SC Gupte, who said a suit filed by few minority shareholders cannot be treated as a representative suit on behalf of all the non-promoter shareholders. The shareholders had demanded over Rs 41,000 crore in damages for themselves and other non-promoter shareholders of the listed group companies for “losses suffered as a result”. The damages sought were for losses due to a drop in the share prices of eight Tata Group companies since the market closing on October 24, 2016, when Mistry was ousted, to December 6, 2016.

Shah and the other appellants filed an application along with the suit seeking permission under order 1, rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code, a provision that says that one or more persons may, with the permission of court, sue or defend on behalf of all interested individuals.

  1. N
    Nisha K.Potty
    Jul 11, 2017 at 7:34 am
    Well thought decision , otherwise more n more small grps will raise head for money will create turbulence to smooth mgmt. The judgement is good example for other conglomerates also .
    Reply
    1. R
      ramesh
      Jul 11, 2017 at 6:11 pm
      change your name...it stinks....haha
      Reply
    2. N
      Nisha K.Potty
      Jul 11, 2017 at 7:28 am
      Well thought decision . Otherwise many small small grps will start raising head for money will bring turbulence to smooth mgmt . This is good example for other Conglomerates
      Reply

      Go to Top