1. West Bengal’s child rights body moves Supreme Court in support of Rohingyas

West Bengal’s child rights body moves Supreme Court in support of Rohingyas

West Bengal's child rights body today moved the Supreme Court against the Centre's move to deport all Rohingya Muslims to Myanmar, saying the entire community cannot be branded as terrorists.

By: | New Delhi | Published: September 21, 2017 4:50 PM
Rohingya Muslims, Rohingya Muslims deportation, Rohingya Muslims india, rohingya, rohingya myanmar, Rohingya Muslims myanmar The plea has challenged the notification of the central government asking for identification and deportation of all Rohingyas to Myanmar. (PTI)

West Bengal’s child rights body today moved the Supreme Court against the Centre’s move to deport all Rohingya Muslims to Myanmar, saying the entire community cannot be branded as terrorists. The plea was filed by West Bengal State Commission for Protection of Child Rights (WBSCPCR) in the apex court which has already fixed a PIL, filed by two Rohingya Muslim refugees challenging their deportation, for hearing on October 3.

Ananya Chakraborty, Chairperson of the rights panel, said the plea has been accepted in the apex court registry and would be heard on the date already fixed. The plea has challenged the notification of the central government asking for identification and deportation of all Rohingyas to Myanmar.

The child rights commission has said that Rohingyas are being “systematically tortured and killed” and the entire community cannot be branded terrorists. Even the United Nations has described them as the “most persecuted community in the world,” it has said.

Earlier, the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), in its affidavit, had termed the Rohingyas as “illegal” immigrants and alleged that some of them were part of a “sinister” design of Pakistan’s ISI and terror groups such as the ISIS. Their presence in the country will pose a “serious” national security threat, the Centre had said, adding that the fundamental right to settle in any part of the country was available only to citizens and not the Rohingyas.

It also categorically stated that the apex court should not invoke its jurisdiction, as the issue of Rohingyas “fell under the exclusive domain of policy decision of the executive”.

The affidavit was submitted as a response to the plea filed by Rohingya immigrants Mohammad Salimullah and Mohammad Shaqir, who had claimed that they had taken refuge in India after escaping from Myanmar due to widespread discrimination, violence and bloodshed against the community there.

Former RSS ideologue and Rashtriya Swabhiman Andolan leader K N Govindacharaya had also moved the Supreme Court seeking to intervene in the pending PIL on Rohingyas. He has opposed the plea of two Rohingya refugees saying they are a burden on country’s resources and pose serious threat to national security.

  1. piyush agarwal
    Oct 9, 2017 at 1:47 pm
    It’s a shame that even after so many days Supreme Court has not given any final verdict on such sensitive issues of national security neither allowed government to take action. Such delays clearly shows interest of judges, allowing Rohingya’s to migrate and spread in India. It’s a shame on India’s Judiciary where HC judges pass verdict within no time to realize losses of riots from Ram Raheem but Supreme Court judges are still delaying on such sensitive issues. We should have rules to prosecute judges for such laxity and trial against them for losses due to such delays and anti-national favors. Its ridicules, when we talk about terrorism or anti-national elements (mostly Muslims) we refer to India’s great culture/ mercy/ leniency / compassion/charity etc. of ancient Hindu culture without mentioning cases like Prithvi Raj Chouhan and Ghori. No Muslim emperor has ever showed such mercy.
    Reply

    Go to Top