1. Want to e-auction Taj Mansingh Hotel: NDMC to Supreme Court

Want to e-auction Taj Mansingh Hotel: NDMC to Supreme Court

The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) today told the Supreme Court that it wants to e-auction the iconic five-star Taj Mansingh Hotel in the heart of the national capital.

By: | New Delhi | Published: March 3, 2017 6:55 PM
NDMC, Supreme Court, Delhi high Court, Taj Mansingh Hotel, Tata's Indian Hotels Company Ltd, Ministry of Home Affairs The apex court had on November 21 last year directed that status quo be maintained with regard to NDMC’s auctioning process of Taj Mansingh Hotel.(PTI)

The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) today told the Supreme Court that it wants to e-auction the iconic five-star Taj Mansingh Hotel in the heart of the national capital. A bench of Justices P C Ghose and R F Nariman agreed to hear the NDMC’s plea on March 22 and asked Tata’s Indian Hotels Company Ltd (IHCL), which has challenged a Delhi High Court order allowing auction of the hotel, to file objections, if any, within a week.

The apex court had earlier asked the NDMC to reconsider its decision to auction the five-star hotel in the wake of the Attorney General and Solicitor General’s opinion not to initiate any such process.

It had noted the fact that the opinions of both top law officers against the auctioning of the hotel was not placed before the Ministry of Home Affairs for consideration.

The bench had also taken note of the fact that there was an internal opinion of top NDMC officials against the auctioning process.

You may also like to watch:

It had told Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain that NDMC had informed the ministry that opinions of the AG and SG favouring extension of lease, were still awaited.

“It is strange and doesn’t look bonafide. The AG and SG’s opinions should have been placed before the ministry concerned,” the bench had said.

When the bench had asked ASG Jain, who was appearing for NDMC, whether the body agreed to reconsider the decision of going ahead with the auctioning process, he had replied, “No”.

To this, the bench had said, “Why are you not agreeing to reconsider the decision. It not a matter of right. Do you not want to be fair to the party who has been paying the rent continuously for 30 years.”

IHCL had earlier told the apex court that it was “not clear” why NDMC wanted to auction the prime property which gave the “best revenue” to it.

The company had earlier submitted that NDMC expert report suggests that the council would “lose revenue” if the hotel was auctioned to other players.

The apex court had on November 21 last year directed that status quo be maintained with regard to NDMC’s auctioning process of Taj Mansingh Hotel.

The apex court had also refused NDMC’s prayer that the hotel should be restrained from taking any fresh bookings, saying “it is very difficult to restrain fresh bookings for a running hotel. Everything will be decided when we hear the matter.”

IHCL, which runs the hotel, had on November 8 last year approached the apex court against the Delhi High Court’s order that cleared the decks for auctioning of the iconic property.

The firm had challenged the October 27 last year’s verdict delivered by a division bench of the high court dismissing IHCL’s petition challenging the move by NDMC to auction the property.

The high court had dismissed IHCL’s plea saying the company has “no right” for renewal of the licence period and NDMC was “within its power” to secure maximum consideration for grant of licence for the property located at the prime location of 1, Man Singh Road in Lutyen’s Delhi.

IHCL had moved the division bench of the high court against the September 5 last year judgement of a single judge who had not acceded to the firm’s request for renewal of licence for a further period, saying it was not entitled for the extension.

The property, owned by NDMC, was given to IHCL on a lease of 33 years. The lease had ended in 2011 and the company was given nine temporary extensions since then on various grounds, with three of them granted last year itself.

NDMC had earlier said it was in the process of assessing the assets of the hotel in preparation for the much-delayed auction.

IHCL had earlier approached the single judge bench of the high court seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining NDMC from interfering in any manner with the possession, right to operate, run and maintain the hotel premises.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top