1. State funding of polls may not be popular once rolled out, says FM Arun Jaitley

State funding of polls may not be popular once rolled out, says FM Arun Jaitley

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley today said state funding of polls needs to be debated as cynics may question why people should be taxed extra to fund elections and there is "no guarantee" that outside money will not find its way into campaign financing.

By: | New Delhi | Published: March 8, 2017 9:50 PM
Arun Jaitley, Finance Minister, Elections, Campaign Finance Reform in India, Political parties Jaitley said while political parties have floated this idea, none have seriously discussed the two caveats.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley today said state funding of polls needs to be debated as cynics may question why people should be taxed extra to fund elections and there is “no guarantee” that outside money will not find its way into campaign financing. Jaitley was all for financing of political parties through ‘Electoral Bonds’, which he proposed in his budget speech. The bonds will open for sale a little before every election and donors can buy the bearer bonds from scheduled banks and donate to parties of their choice.

“It (state funding of elections) is a possible suggestion. But I will add only two caveats. It should not be read that I am critical of it.

“Many are going to question in long run in India given the level of cynicism in public opinion as to why people should be taxed extra in order to fund political elections,” he said at a discussion on ‘Campaign Finance Reform in India’.

You may also like to watch:

Also, in this model, where the government gives funds to political parties or candidates for contesting elections, there is “no guarantee” that only the money received from the state will be utilised and no outside funds will be spent, he argued.

“The argument is you can’t spend within that limit and obviously you take some from the state and then you go hunting elsewhere,” he said. “It (state funding of elections) is a slogan. I am not too sure if it’s going to a be a popular one once it is rolled out.”

Jaitley said while political parties have floated this idea, none have seriously discussed the two caveats.

“I’m not saying I will rule out the state funding idea completely… Let’s have it for discussion on the table… Let us discuss because even the present model is a experimental model because if it has taken us 70 years to reach a solution, you have to discuss all the models,” he said.

The state funding model, he said, is dependent on whether candidates spend within the prescribed norm. “There is an uneasy feeling that it’s not true,” he said.

Also, a political party’s expenditure, which includes that on staff, vehicles, planes and advertisements, will be outside the scope of what the government will fund.

“Surely you don’t expect the government to fund parties having aircraft and helicopters. I’m sure if my understanding of India’s public opinion is what it is, there will be a hue and cry if we have that model,” he said.

The Finance Minister said state funding is being mentioned as an attractive model but the government can only fund what the candidate has to spend officially.

“Beyond that… there is a huge world of expenditure outside that. I don’t think the Indrajit Gupta Committee (on state funding of elections) envisaged the system getting so costlier,” Jaitley added.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top