1. Sabarimala temple case referred to Constitution Bench by Supreme Court: What is this big legal dispute relating to women’s entry all about?

Sabarimala temple case referred to Constitution Bench by Supreme Court: What is this big legal dispute relating to women’s entry all about?

Today, the Supreme Court has referred the Sabarimala case to the Constitution Bench after apex court judges raised several questions. It was expected that the apex court is likely to announce the verdict today on whether women can enter the Sabarimala Temple.

By: | Updated: October 13, 2017 11:03 AM
Sabarimala temple case, supreme court, womern entrance in  sabarimala temple, latest news on Sabarimala temple case, all about Sabarimala temple case, Lord Ayappa, kerala, Naisthak Bramhachari, Kerala High Court , Ravi Varma Raja Sabarimala, one of Kerala’s most renowned temples which has Lord Ayappa as the presiding deity, does not allow menstruating women to enter the temple.

Today, the Supreme Court has referred the Sabarimala case to the Constitution Bench after apex court judges raised several questions. It was expected that the apex court is likely to announce the verdict today on whether women can enter the Sabarimala Temple. Earlier this year in February, the apex court reserved an order while referring the case to a Constitution bench.

Wondering what this dispute is all about and why it is gathering steam among sections of women activists?

Sabarimala, one of Kerala’s most renowned temples which has Lord Ayappa as the presiding deity, does not allow menstruating women to enter the temple. This is the main reason for the dispute as women activists have questioned this as a clear practice of gender discrimination.

The temple’s restriction on menstruating women has been a bone of contention in recent times, raising legal questions about women’s right to pray and right to equality, as guaranteed by the Constitution of India.Article 14 of the Constitution of India guarantees that the state cannot deny any person equality before the law or equal protection of the law. Article 15 of the Constitution places a clear constitutional obligation on the state to not discriminate against any citizen on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth.

The earlier UDF government’s affidavit before the Supreme Court had supported the temple’s tradition that the deity’s form is that of a Naisthak Bramhachari who observes celibacy and therefore, young women should not worship in the temple. In November last year, after the Left government took charge in Kerala, there was a U-turn by the state government from its earlier stance and the affidavit stated that it was ready to allow women of all ages to enter Sabarimala. But first, take a step back and understand what makes Sabarimala a unique place of worship in Kerala.

In 1991, a Kerala High Court Bench comprising of Justices K. Paripoornan and KB Marar had held that the restriction on young women by the Travancore Devaswom Board is not violative of the Constitution and nor was it violative of the provisions of the Hindu Places of Public Worship (Authorisation of Entry) Act, 1965. The rationale of the judgment is that the prohibition was only regarding a particular age group of women and not all women.

Further, the Kerala High Court had examined Ravi Varma Raja of the royal family of Pandalam, to which the Sabarimala temple belongs, and High Court verdict referred to their consistency with the temple tradition that the presiding deity is worshipped as a ‘Naisthik Bramhachari.’ However, about 25 years after the Kerala High Court judgment, the Supreme Court has questioned the logic and examined the reason for the restriction on women’s entry into Sabarimala temple. Almost every year, it is reported that 3.5 to 4 crore devotees visit the shrine during the ‘Mandalam’ period that starts in November till January.

  1. Murali Dharan
    Oct 13, 2017 at 12:14 pm
    These so called women activists are not really asking for equality. They are challenging the belief and trust of millions of Lord Ayyappa devotees. Women are not restricted entry to the Temple but only age restriction is set taking into consideration the mensuration, which in any case is not a perfect time to enter any sacred place. Whether it is the judges of Supreme Court or the arrogant Woman Activists, no one is above the Lord Ayyappa.
    Reply

    Go to Top