1. Opposition slams Jharkhand government after Governor returns amendments in land acts

Opposition slams Jharkhand government after Governor returns amendments in land acts

A day after Jharkhand Governor Draupadi Murmu returned amendments to the two contentions land acts, opposition parties in Jharkhand on Monday said the BJP government should not "dare" bring in such amendments again in the state assembly.

By: | Published: June 26, 2017 8:30 PM

 

Jharkhand, Draupadi Murmu, BJP, Land acts, opposition parties A day after Jharkhand Governor Draupadi Murmu returned amendments to the two contentions land acts, opposition parties in Jharkhand on Monday said the BJP government should not “dare” bring in such amendments again in the state assembly. (Image: IE)

A day after Jharkhand Governor Draupadi Murmu returned amendments to the two contentions land acts, opposition parties in Jharkhand on Monday said the BJP government should not “dare” bring in such amendments again in the state assembly. “The state government should not commit such mistakes. The state assembly was misused to bring amendments in both the land acts. We welcome the Governor’s decision as she understood the feelings of tribal community members,” Hemant Soren, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) Executive president and former Chief Minister, told reporters here on Monday.

“The state government should not dare to again bring the amendments otherwise we will again hit the roads to protest,” he added. He demanded that the Domicile Policy formulated last year should be redefined. Former central Minister and Congress leader Subodh Kant Sahay, welcoming the Governor’s decision, said: “This was a question of the existence of the traditions and culture of Jharkhand. The amendments were brought to help industrialists and it had nothing to do with the development of the state.”

You may also like to watch:

Jharkhand Governor Draupdi Murmu returned the amendments in the two land acts – Chotanagpur Tenancy (CNT) Act and Santhal Pargana Tenancy (SPT) Act. The amendments were passed by the state assembly by voice vote amid stiff protest by the opposition parties in the assembly in November last year. The opposition members while opposing the amendments had misbehaved with Speaker Dinesh Oraon when the amendments were tabled. The Governor returned the amendment bills with a query asking “How the amendments will benefit the tribal people?”

The amendments in both the acts were pending with the Governor since November last year. The opposition parties, Cardinal Telesphore Toppo and other tribal leaders had separately met the Governor and requested her not to clear the amendment bills. According to sources in the government, 192 petitions were filed by different political parties and associations to Governor Murmu requesting her not to clear the amendments The amendments were opposed by the entire opposition and also BJP alliance partner All Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU). The amendments were also opposed by BJP legislators and Lok Sabha MPs.

Ignoring all opposition, the BJP government led by Ragubar Das had passed the amendments. With the amendments, if approved by the Governor, agricultural land could be used for non agriculture purposes. The amendments had proposed that agricultural land can be acquired for development work, infrastructure and other works by the state government. Since Governor Murmu returned the amendments, the state government has remained tight-lipped over the issue.

  1. R
    ranjan kumar
    Jul 12, 2017 at 12:19 pm
    chotanagpur area while in bihar developed without such amendments, so now that the ijharkhand state was created, the question is for whom was it created and now the developement which we talk about ,whois the developement for ..that is the biggest question.and not the developement itself fratstructure etc have come up as it is without the amendment.the government wants to snatch the tibals of whatever is left of them
    Reply

    Go to Top