1. DA case: SC grants 6 months to probe charges against ex-UP minister

DA case: SC grants 6 months to probe charges against ex-UP minister

Supreme Court today gave six months to probe agencies to complete investigation into allegations that former Uttar Pradesh minister and BSP leader Naseemuddin Siddiqui and his spouse amassed disproportionate assets while holding...

By: | New Delhi | Published: September 26, 2016 10:25 PM
A bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice A M Khanwilkar asked the agencies, CBI and Enforcement Directorate to take the probe to the logical end in accordance with law. (PTI) A bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice A M Khanwilkar asked the agencies, CBI and Enforcement Directorate to take the probe to the logical end in accordance with law. (PTI)

Supreme Court today gave six months to probe agencies to complete investigation into allegations that former Uttar Pradesh minister and BSP leader Naseemuddin Siddiqui and his spouse amassed disproportionate assets while holding public office.

A bench of Chief Justice T S Thakur and Justice A M Khanwilkar asked the agencies, CBI and Enforcement Directorate to take the probe to the logical end in accordance with law.

“Considering the fact that the law enforcement agencies are on their job for quite sometime, we express a sanguine hope that they would complete the investigation/enquiry at the earliest and not later than six months from today and take the same to its logical end in accordance with law,” the bench said.

The verdict came on an appeal filed against the Allahabad High Court order refusing to allow a PIL seeking implementation of the recomendation of state Lokayukta.

The Uttar Pradesh Lokayukta, in the recommendation, had ordered probe by CBI and ED after finding prima facie evidence against in the complaint filed by Jagdish Narain Shukla against Naseemuddin and his wife Husna Siddiqui.

As the recommendation was not complied, Shukla had approached the High Court which said “the opinion of the Lokayukta in the report cannot be construed to be final or conclusive as it was a fact finding enquiry and a detailed enquiry is yet to be made after affording opportunity of hearing to the person against whom complaint is made.”

The High Court had also said that there was no public interest involved in the petition.

The apex court, which did not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, asked the agencies already probing the matter to take the investigation to its logical end.

“We make it clear that we are not expressing any opinion on the merits of the matters under investigation/enquiry or the defence that may be available to respondent nos. 5 and 6 (Siddiqui and his wife) in any proceedings to be instituted against them in relation to the said matters,” the bench said.

The Lokayukta in its report had concluded on the basis of prima facie evidences that Siddiquis, besides buying various properties, had purchased land worth over Rs 16 crore for a meagre price of Rs 46 lakh for their private society.

Apart from this, as per the report the couple had also purchased agriculture land worth Rs one crore located in Tindwari of district Banda for a meagre price of Rs 4.5 lakh.

  1. N
    Narendra M
    Sep 27, 2016 at 3:30 am
    Use of one's office to make wealth in an illegal manner is absolutely clear. However, what we notice in all cases of disproportionate ets, amed by politicians, bureaucrats or others, is that legal battles take a very long time. In fact our legal system is such that it provides for delays which ist those who are guilty of aming wealth in an illegal manner. Unless we take steps to establish fast track courts to deal exclusively and expeditiously with corruption cases, we would end up with thousands of such undecided cases.
    Reply

    Go to Top