|
Fifth Column - Dialectics of support and sabotage
Tavleen Singh
Have you been to West Bengal lately? Have you wandered through the streets
of Calcutta and seen children scrabbling for food in garbage heaps? Have you
seen the despair, the relentless, desperate poverty in which a terrifyingly
large proportion of the citizens of the City of Joy live? Have you been to
Bengal's villages and seen the appalling condition of primary schools in
this supposedly enlightened Marxist state?
Well, I have, dear readers, and let me tell you that I found it easy to
understand why the NCAER (National Council of Applied Economic Research)
found it necessary last year to add West Bengal to the list of four
Hindi-belt states that are considered the poorest, most backward, regions of
India. There is poverty elsewhere in our country but almost nowhere does it
acquire the grim, hopeless visage that it does in Mr Jyoti Basu's Marxist
paradise and yet these Marxists dare to lecture us daily on economic
matters.
How? Why? On what basis? And, while we are about it who is this man
Harkishen Singh Surjeet that we should be forced to listen to his ludicrous
opinions on subjects that should be entirely within the domain of
government. Comrade Surjeet appears to like publicity as much as he does the
sound of his own opinions so it's impossible to switch on a news bulletin
these days without coming face to face with himwhite turbanned,
white-bearded, white (foreign?) telephone in hand, holding forth on whatever
the issue of the day might be. Generally, what he has to say is not worth
the soundbyte or newsprint that records it but he appears to manage
nevertheless to play the role in Delhi these days of obstructing any
intelligent, sensible thing the government might want to do.
Last week the Finance Minister admitted that the government was wasting
thousands of crores of taxpayers' money on subsidies that had no merit, and
in doing so made one of the bravest and most significant statements by an
Indian politician in recent times. ``We have been subsidising things like
milk for Delhiites, feeling they are in great need of this, transportation
and about 90 per cent of higher education. We have completely ignored
primary education and primary health sectors, which has resulted in 70 per
cent of the population still not having access to primary health and 50 per
cent still illiterate.'' Dead right, Mr Chidambaram, absolutely dead right.
But, no sooner were the words out of his mouth than Surjeet and his fellow
comrades were ready to tell anyone who cared to listen than they thought
cutting subsidies would `further contribute to the misery of the people who
are already reeling under the impact of escalating prices'.
Comrade Surjeet appears to like deliberately missing the point which in this
case is that we are subsidising university education at the cost of primary
education. The result is that we have the largest number of illiterate
people in the world while the children of middle-class comrades like Shri
Surjeet in any case go abroad for higher studies.
The Finance Minister pointed out also that his ministry's white paper on
subsidies had established that we spend more than 50 per cent of them on
lowering the price of such things as milk in Delhi and providing electricity
free to farmers who might be willing and able to pay for regular supplies of
it. The white paper estimates that we spent Rs 137,388 crore, an estimated
14.4 per cent of the GDP in 1994-95, on subsidies of which less than
one-third goes on `merit' items like primary education, roads and bridges.
Most of it goes on `non-merit' items like electricity, transport,
irrigation, agriculture and higher education which, in fact, many Indians
can afford to pay for.
If we cut the non-merit bits down we could also cut the fiscal deficit and
we might even end up with money to spare so that `the people' in cities like
Calcutta and Mumbai can live less miserable lives. So, please go ahead Mr
Chidambaram and do whatever you think needs to be done and if you get too
much interference from Comrade Surjeet and his pals then chuck their
`outside' support. There are abundant signs from the government's other
`outside' supporters that they are willing and eager to come inside as soon
as possible and, frankly, however decrepit and corrupt the Congress Party
may have become, it is infinitely preferable to comrades like Surjeet.
Copyright © 1997 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd.
|
|