|
Making tourism go rural — and bankable
Harjeet
Ahluwalia
A critical area that India has ignored all these years, and
continues to do so, is integration of infrastructure development
with services — the sunrise sector on which growth hopes are
pinned worldwide. Financial sector services, information technology,
hospitality, etc., can all be clubbed in a comprehensive strategy
towards development of the largest employment provider in
the world: tourism.
There is widespread concern over the fall-out
of the terrorist attacks in the US on tourism internationally.
Institutional efforts are on by the International Air Transport
Association and the World Tourism Organisation, etc., to rally
governments in support of the critical segments of travel
and tourism. A sizeable number of progressively-thinking nations
are fully backing their carriers and tourism trade as well.
Still, a much larger number of players need to come together
and cobble a workable strategy to restore traveller confidence
in general.
India, in particular, ought to closely watch and involve itself
in reshaping this post-WTC scenario. This could help it get
over its long-standing disadvantages of poor infrastructure
coupled with pitifully half-baked and tacky efforts to sell
itself as a tourist destination.
A gaping hole in the Indian tourism landscape is rural infrastructure.
To a rank outsider here to peep at our culture and heritage,
the Indian roadside is that single feature en route to popular
tourist destinations which is highly representative of the
all-pervasive neglect of basic amenities. Of course, there
is much to be desired in urban infrastructure as well. But
in the countryside, pictures of abandoned huts, disused farm
vehicles, open toilets, garbage and refuse piles, overgrown
meadows, etc., unfold a tale that needs no telling by human
speech.
In places where there is no food, no clothing, no road, no
electricity, signs of deprivation hang eloquently from such
symbols. Even if rudimentary infrastructure is in place, it
lacks presentable or acceptable forms of hospitality avenues.
Roadside eateries can be so ramshackle that tourists will
not stop to buy bottled water there, leave alone tea or snacks.
Such outlets may serve the drudgery-stricken locals well enough,
but there is a strong case for the tourism industry tying
up with industrial houses, banks and even state government
institutions to spruce up the rural side of Indian culture.
The banking institutions today are overflowing with cash.
Indeed, banks have been crying hoarse over the need for innovative,
bankable projects to beef up rural infrastructure. Rural roads
alone require Rs 4.5 lakh crore worth of expenditure. A tourism
ministry paper over five years back had laid out an ambitious
roadmap for developing purely tourism-related infrastructure,
and the estimated cost of such development was then pegged
at Rs 60,000 crore-plus.
It would be no surprise if the paper has, by now, been recycled
by moths. Industry, too, has little to look forward to in
these days of slump. It is also fuming over the government’s
inability to get going the rural economy. Roads and communications
are core to prosperity in these areas. If the states are unwilling
for political reasons to commit public spending on villages
and talukas, it is time for industries and large houses to
spur this urge among states.
Once investment flows in through infrastructure to tourism,
there will be a steady flow of employment avenues downstream.
More jobs can easily generate a higher demand for goods in
those areas, apart from stemming the ever-growing tide of
immigrants into towns and cities. It is a matter of concern,
indeed, that industry should always wait for incentives and
prodding from governments — it is time to reverse pressure
points and fulfil some of its obligations towards the larger
sections of society: that of driving development through their
own initiatives. Once jobs create enough awareness in the
market, those who can afford it and see its benefits will
respond to the call of education — thereby inducing growth
of primary education and thereafter healthcare. And all these
are sectors that banks would be game to help, provided borrowers
can assure enough commitment to the cause and industriously
work for returns.
It should not be difficult for industries or even apex chambers
to identify villages with high cultural appeal, take them
over on a contractual, turnkey basis. This does not need changes
in the oft-quoted land ceiling laws. Such sponsors could provide
the inhabitants the expertise and wherewithal to maintain
roads, pavements, electricity connections, water pipelines,
even ethnic shopping malls, and also keep a constant watch
through outsourcing to the locals themselves. Strategic tie-ups
with tour operators could fetch droves of town-weary domestic
and foreign tourists to well-maintained spots. If their contact
with the outside world can be ensured, many of the 10-million-odd
domestic tourists too will be less loth to make such forays.
Private helipads, chartered mini trains, cultural, health
and winter tourism are just a few of the many novel means
to dispense with a general unwillingness to travel across
India.
With such institutional backing, bankers to the selfsame industries
would be more comfortable lending for village development.
Rope in the panchayats, the local magistrates and collectors,
and the scene could change drastically for the better. It
cannot be that no such gesture will find reciprocity among
rural entrepreneurs.
For starters, investment in pilot projects at prudently chosen
tourism circuits can go a long way in putting the Indian map
high on the travel agenda. The players have been present all
along, only the will is lacking.
|